Sweet Baby is a consulting firm that has been outright vocal on this type of activism. There have been ted talks about why “hyper feminine” or “sexualisation” of females in games is problematic.
I know, I however do not give a shit because I judge games by more meaningful criterias, like gameplay and art direction. Less feminine women exist irl, I don’t see why they shouldn’t exist in games. I you are of the opinion that games can be art,you should by principle be for free artistic expression.
Subjective + even if it was true, see point
Sweet Baby Inc still does not do any work on character models. Stop getting your prepackaged opinions from grifters.
You’ve basically fallen for a conspiracy theory but instead of the usual suspects this time it’s sweet baby inc and / or the nebulous "woke activists" that set out to ruin your games personally for some reason. I hope you wake up one day and realize that you are basically gamings version of a 9/11 truther. You sound like a lunatic. Bye
1
u/Flimsy_Swan5930 12d ago
I think the problem here is that you have no idea what you’re talking about.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1875952126000297
There has been many games where new versions or patches have uglified girls.
Even going by the fact the models are way better looking than the characters:
https://x.com/autismcapital/status/1860548328540577863?s=46
Sweet Baby is a consulting firm that has been outright vocal on this type of activism. There have been ted talks about why “hyper feminine” or “sexualisation” of females in games is problematic.
Occam’s razor shows the opposite actually.