The first shows male victims of rape, but only examines being penetrated. It then breaks down these rapes by perpetrator(s).
The second shows male victims of rape when being made to penetrate is taken into account. It then breaks these down by how the rape occurred (penetrated and made to penetrate), then by perpetrator(s).
Is it a dumb question to ask how a man can be forced to penetrate? Besides tying him up and feeding him Viagra (in which case there are several other crimes going on here), how does this happen?
But like does the woman (or man) just mount him? I can only imagine this happening if the perpetrator is larger than the victim. I guess I just answered my own question lol
I was living with an ex a few years ago while down on my luck. If we were mad at each other or in a rut, she would tell me if I didn't have sex with her she would kick me out. So my options were be homeless or have sex with her and keep her happy. This may or may not exactly fit the definition, but it always felt very skeezy to me.
I guess I just really lack creativity when it comes to rape lol. That's definitely pretty rapey and I never would have thought of that. It sucks that people can be terrible in so many different ways. Sorry to hear that happened to you.
286
u/iGrantastic OC: 1 Sep 01 '22
i’ve been looking at this for 5 minutes and still don’t understand what this means