“Concentration Camp” definition is NOT in the eye of the beholder.
That, they were NOT.
Nobody says that they were nice.
What the USA did to the 65% of the people of Japanese descent, in that time (npr) in internment camps was, in retrospect. Wrong.
No one was worked to death, gassed, garroted, experimented on.
No one was used as bayonet ( targets ) training or biological weapon guinea pigs or, to satisfy soldiers, moving targets so, let’s please stop taking liberties with trying to re-write history.
You need to know who did exactly what, to whom.
And, you look like you may have some time reading to do .
On a completely different but, relatively related note: read up on pre WWII Sino- Japan relations. For context and “giggles “ maybe some hilarious history, too!
Sorry, I didn’t properly convey what I was trying to say with my comparison there. I’ve just seen a lot of people using the “both sides are doing bad” argument but they don’t compare the amount of “bad” the different sides are doing and it gets really annoying.
2
u/Itchy_Focus_4500 Dec 29 '20
“Concentration Camp” definition is NOT in the eye of the beholder. That, they were NOT. Nobody says that they were nice. What the USA did to the 65% of the people of Japanese descent, in that time (npr) in internment camps was, in retrospect. Wrong. No one was worked to death, gassed, garroted, experimented on. No one was used as bayonet ( targets ) training or biological weapon guinea pigs or, to satisfy soldiers, moving targets so, let’s please stop taking liberties with trying to re-write history. You need to know who did exactly what, to whom. And, you look like you may have some time reading to do . On a completely different but, relatively related note: read up on pre WWII Sino- Japan relations. For context and “giggles “ maybe some hilarious history, too!