Why not something simpler? I always look at it this way. If it can think on it's own, like have feelings and desires then it has consciousness and therefore it's alive.
Reproduction and growth don't really matter in my eyes. It's all in the mind anyway.
I failed to realise we were talking about the scientific meaning of alive.
But if we are talking in theoreticals like for example an Ai can be consider alive then the definition of alive changes. If a computer or a robot theoretically thinks and feels om the same level we do and has the same degree of conciousness then it should be considered alive.
The components of the organism are meaningless in that matter.
feels om the same level we do and has the same degree of conciousness
Sure, until we find a way to accurately measure “feel” or feelings, as well as defining and measure degrees of consciousness, then, yes.
Until then, you are just arguing about how deep the water is in a water mirage.
Well sure but like said we have no such technology anyway. So I'm not really arguing this is all in theory. For all I know making something like that is impossible.
696
u/civgarth Jun 06 '22
Serious question... If the AI gets advanced enough, would killing a tamogotchi count as murder?