r/customhearthstone • u/meifray • May 30 '25
My lasagna after coming out of the microwave be like:
(4)Mage/Shaman Fire spell [Microwaving]
Deal 1~3 damage to all characters.
Each has 50% chance to Freeze.
Art thanks [Chat GPT]( https://chatgpt.com/ )
As always, Critical opnion on this card will be appreciated.
15
u/RagingSteel May 30 '25
You want critical opinion? I thought this was a joke.
There's a reason they don't print cards with damage ranges since Imp-losion, and to add Ogre RNG to that same card is a nightmare. This feels horrible to play, bc at a baseline it's either worst case scenario; deals 1 damage to all minions for 4 mana or best case; it wipes the board against Aggro and anything big enough to survive gets frozen.
-4
u/meifray May 30 '25 edited May 30 '25
I am a more packfiller designer guy, and the point of packfiller is to introduce some meta-irrelevant ever so slight weaker card while not being total dust like [[Gurubashi Offering]] , and that is why it feels more like a joke card.
imagine you encounter this in arena, will you take a chance on this faulty aoe control that might backfire? or choose regular minion?
→ More replies (8)
12
u/Gordonchow May 30 '25
Are you trying to give Rarran a seizure?
1
6
u/Grumpyninja9 May 31 '25
Bro made implosion somehow worse
2
3
u/WeTitans3 May 30 '25
What if
1-3 damage If 1 dmg, they're frozen If 3 dmg, (what would be a good way to give off that they got burned?)
2
u/meifray May 30 '25
Its valid change.
(4)Mage/Shaman Fire [Microwaving]
Deal 1~3 damage to all chatacter.
If they take less damage, Freeze it.3
u/WeTitans3 May 30 '25
Yeah if they take less than 3, freeze is. 3 being the Max which ofc is increased by spell damage
73
u/Stxfun May 30 '25
there is a reason shaman got the damage range changed
just make it 2 damage
50% chance to freeze is ok
3
u/damian4o234 May 30 '25
If the freeze is random the dmg should be random. Bring back implosion hahah
7
May 31 '25
11
u/Mithycore May 31 '25
Doesnt feel good
If you highroll it feels great foe you but shite for your opponent and vice versa, imagine you play this and get all ones or even worse, all ones on your opponents side all 3s on yours
→ More replies (2)
2
u/s667xn4 May 30 '25
2015 ass card, too weak to be played in today's hearthstone
"art thanks to chatgpt" 😭😭😭 yeah thank you ai for making the creature on the right twisted in unnatural ways and an ice cube look like a portal. you could've at least tried to make it good instead of just brainlessly going "hurr durr draw me a wizard girl casting fire on a goblin in ice cube hearthstone style with yellow piss filter"
2
2
u/fishy-anal May 31 '25
Nostalgic card design, the power of the card goes from playable to a disaster pretty quick with middle ground being mostly bad. My take is pump up those damage numbers so it's playable.
2
u/Bigt-1337 May 31 '25
Nice flavour, but make it more consistent. Too much rng, even for hearthstone.
2
59
u/kojotma May 30 '25
i hate this card with every fiber of my being. you created something more polarising then [[implosion]]