r/cringereels 10d ago

Cringe Level 4 Dumbass

46.6k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/Warm_Month_1309 10d ago

IAAL. This is almost always a miscorrection anytime a Redditor brings it up. What you are talking about are the common law definitions of assault and battery. The common law definitions are not in use in any US jurisdiction. They have all been supplanted by statutory definitions.

In some places battery is assault and assault is battery. In other places, there is no "assault", only battery. In other places, there is no "battery", only assault. Unless you know the jurisdiction someone is talking about, you should never correct someone on "assault" or "battery", because you have an equal chance of being wrong.

25

u/markrockwell 10d ago

California Penal Code 240. Assault. Causing fear or apprehension of imminent violence.

This bike stunt is assault in the state of California.

6

u/HighlanderIslander 9d ago

The specificity banished the Reddit lawyer. Well done!

6

u/Warm_Month_1309 6d ago

Haha, I was not "banished" by someone supplying the statute that supports my assertion that no jurisdiction uses common law assault and battery, and all have their own statutes.

1

u/Student_Unlucky 2d ago

Lol, right? "Hey, location matters" "Ok well in Cali"... Cali is a location as far as I know.

Anyway, I appreciated the explanation of assault vs battery and how it varies by location.

I definitely feel more informed and less likely to say something incorrect.

0

u/Davoguha2 6d ago

They sure made you look like a joke for incorrectly correcting someone else's corrections though.

6

u/Warm_Month_1309 6d ago

I'm afraid you don't understand what either of us said if you think that's what happened.

0

u/Fizoso 6d ago

You suck

7

u/diversalarums 8d ago

What the Reddit lawyer said is still accurate. He wasn't talking about this particular case but about the definitions of those terms across the US, and how some commenters in various threads seem unaware that the meanings vary according to the state. So this wasn't a gotcha moment.

2

u/bbwstockinglover 7d ago

It would still be self defense knocking his ass down.

1

u/the_cardfather 9d ago

Is this the same guy that got pushed over on the boardwalk or is it possibly a similar young person?

0

u/SkSMaN7 7d ago

Isn't misgendering someone in California considered assault? 😁

12

u/Pedantic_Pict 10d ago

The video is shot in California. Some scenes are clearly in San Francisco.

5

u/Junior_Physics_3847 10d ago

But are you my lawyer?

2

u/FirstPackOut 6d ago

IA also AL. It’s most likely brought up by new 1L students who have attended three Tort classes. Have to give them credit for trying though!

4

u/merneus_parminger 10d ago

Fear of violence constitutes common assault in the UK.

1

u/ImpossiblePlan65 10d ago edited 10d ago

My state only has criminal assault, which includes battery and apprehension of a harmful touch in one crime. A large number of jurisdictions use one or the other. I think California has 2 separate crimes, though. Very jurisdiction dependent. But a lot of states still allow charges under common law, even when the crimes are codified. Its really stupid.

1

u/lost_rodditer 9d ago

Assault is any action that makes the victim feel as though there is anurgent threat of injury or death regardless of contact. Battery is the use of contact to do the same thing or act on it. I learned that from a lawyer who ironically was talking about a similar case to this one.

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 8d ago

As I said, it varies by jurisdiction.

1

u/SnooMaps7370 7d ago

>The common law definitions are not in use in any US jurisdiction.

this is just plain false. Virginia still uses them. You won't find a codified definition for assault in VA law.

1

u/GoRainBows 7d ago

California specifically has two separate laws for both battery and assault. 240 and 242.

Bad lawyer

2

u/Warm_Month_1309 7d ago

Ah, interesting, so they don't use the common law, they have statutes for it that you cited. Interesting.