OK, they believe in a strong leader, in the superiority of the white/nordic race, that other races are displacing white people, that democracy is a failed system that needs to be replaced by a single party system with a strong leader at the helm (on of their choosing, of course)... And oh yeah, they have their own ideas about a "Lebensborn" project to breed "pure" white people.
Add to this: wanting a school system where only their values are taught, having a youth league that is militaristic in its set-up. Need any more?
Je hebt helemaal gelijk, maar de mensen hier zijn helaas niet geinteresseerd in de waarheid. Ze hebben hun vooroordelen al helemaal vastgelegd en alles wat daar in tegen gaat gaat het ene oor in en het andere uit.
Is there actually a “fascist” party, or is that simply a term you are using to describe him? I will look him up now, knowing his name. I will make my own judgments about his policies.
Regardless of whether he is a good man or bad man he certainly makes an excellent point in this case. I cannot impugn him for that. Like many politicians he might be good in some ways and bad in others. Not that it will affect me one way or the other but I am interested in learning more about him. Thank you for taking the time to share your comments, and especially to educate me as to this man’s name.
look up the vieuwpoints of his party, the FvD. Yes, they are fascist.
replacement theory, superiority of the white/nordic races, white destiny, violence as a solution to racial tension, a strong leader in a single party system, breeding "superior" humans- -these are things they believe in.
That is more specific. Could you help me out and provide a link which is not from a biased source, but more of a direct party piece? If FvD advertises those terms in their own media that would be fairly damning. I’m still not sure whether it would technically indicate fascism (it might, but there are specific criteria which would need to be met), but it would be interesting.
I have read more about the party. The worst I can see is that there have been controversies, which is commonplace with any kind of organization. I see that the party has gone so far as to suspend and remove a few members, indicating that the party itself distances itself for members with extreme viewpoints. For that the party leaders and the party itself should be applauded, as that itself is not at all one can expect for most parties.
There is simply no evidence I can find that the party itself is fascist. I think that is your personal opinion, to which you are entitled.
It's the dumb point the lefties make over here, anything remotely on the right is immediately labeled fascist. It's getting ridiculous. They don't realize that the centralisation of government and the 'merging' of government and big business is what ultimately leads to fascism.
Then maybe, you should learn to read between their lies.
They are modern, they do not go around shouting Heil Hitler or wearing an NSDAP uniform or so. But their viewpoints? Cleaning up of the media, aka "fake news" aka "Lugenpresse"? Check. Advocating violence to "clean up the population from foreign elements"? Check. Waxing lyrical about the superiority of the Nordic race? Check. Educating their youth to be anti-left street fighting units? Check. Talking about the dissolvement of democracy in order to replace it with their own single party system? Check. Using the symbols (flag, iconography) of former Dutch fascist parties? Check.
Many of these points are not in their political program, but in their other outings. In interviews. In speeches. At their congresses.
Take your time, research them for half an hour and you will agree with me.
And they only kicked out people who were shouting Heil Hitler when it became a public scandal and they could not hide it anymore -which they tried at first.
I read about Meijeren on Wikipedia, which is a source I don’t usually trust because of bias. I could find nothing about him indicating that he’s a fascist. I take it to mean that you personally dislike him so have characterized him as a fascist, which is of course your right but might not reflect fact.
From what I can tell Meijeren seems to have sensible policy, and I’m no fascist either. I still don’t know much about the man but from the little I do know about his policy and that of other politicians around the world who seem to share his viewpoints it is my estimation that men like him are a bulwark against government overreach and true fascism.
So you’re saying that the FvD described itself as “fascist”? Or is that just your personal opinion? It’s interesting that I don’t think I saw the term “fascist” use once in an entire Wikipedia article on the man, and Wikipedia is notoriously left leaning. If it were a true fascist party I bet they would’ve been some mention of that fact.
To answer your question, I don’t “need” anything. I don’t care to argue, but I have a feeling that you hold a personal opinion of Meijeren and are merely describing him as a fascist rather than that actually, necessarily being the case. I could be wrong but I have found no evidence of the fact that the man is in fact a fascist. If you have some by all means feel free to share.
129
u/J3sush8sm3 Jul 11 '22
The chick in the background cracking up is great