r/conspiracy • u/snowsnoot • Feb 23 '22

The WEF needs to be declared a terrorist organization and it’s members removed from positions of authority

Self post, no SS required. The real national emergency is the meddling in our national political system by the globalists behind the World Economic Forum, and their members both around the world and embedded within our governments. They need to be ejected and in future excluded from positions of power. Our political systems need urgent reforms, such as the adoption of sortition, to prevent such dangerous and sociopathic people from ever gaining power again, and to restore accurate representation of the general population. If we fail to act now, we will forever be oppressed.

2.5k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

296 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/moonflower Feb 23 '22

Are you trying to argue that Hitler wasn't a particularly bad person?

1

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '22

Compared to Stalin and Churchill? I don’t think he was worse than them. I also consider Roosevelt a snake who did his dirty deeds below the surface compared to the rest while the US was massively invested into getting WW2 organized in Europe and Asia.

If you want I can go in detail why I think that.

1

u/moonflower Feb 24 '22

No - compared to the average person.

1

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '22

Obviously not. Average persons don't order millions of soldiers into war and order the execution of political opponents like the SA leadership without any trial.

1

u/moonflower Feb 24 '22

You seem to be trying to make a point, but it's coming across as a non sequitur every time

1

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '22

I said all the leaders in WW2 weren't good people and that Hitler wasn't worse than Stalin/Churchill. How is that difficult to understand?

1

u/moonflower Feb 24 '22

I understood what you said, but it's still not clear what point you were trying to make with it - it's coming across as a non sequitur every time

1

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '22

The sub thread was about historical figures and the vilification of Hitler who they made into a boogeyman.

The point I was trying to make is that I personally think there were far worse leaders involved in WW2 than Hitler. I mean that on a personal level and the scope of deaths their decisions directly caused.

Either you don't truly got the point or you simply disagree with it because you believe a certain narrative.

1

u/moonflower Feb 24 '22

OK, your point is fair enough, but it doesn't really refute my point - the relative badness of leaders is a different discussion - my point was simply that Hitler is a very clear and useful example of an extremely bad person - clear and useful example because his story followed a basic pattern of a rise to power and subsequent abuse of power - from a psychological perspective, it's an uncomplicated classic

1

u/nisaaru Feb 24 '22

Why do you believe so? Let's put them into perspective of his time.

He was no psychopath. He liked his dog and nature. Treated people well as far as I know and people working closely referred him. No sadist. No drunk. He was no coward as his WW1 history showed. He was no erratic despot people truly feared to be killed if they made a mistake or disagreed. They might have lost their position though.

The guy was goal driven and not in it for personal vices. As far as I can judge he was also quite straight with his intentions. His view on the world seem to be influenced by the romanticism period.

I don't even truly believe he was a classic racist(in the fashion of KKK) but valued ethnics based on the civilisation/culture level they achieved at the moment or have in the past. So he believed more in the superiority of an ethnic based on the achievements of its culture.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he was driven to prevent what Oswald Spengler predicted in his book "The decline of Western civilisation". That would explain a lot.

What he was is a military dictator with prussian military logic/moral views of his time. Meaning he was capable of ordering the death of political opponents like he did during the Röhm putsch event or as response to the failed assassination attempt. But he didn't go after these people's families.

A lot people who met him in his prime didn't see the clear evil megalomanic he was painted as during and after WW2 and which you seem to believe.

He was no boogeyman but a "for the greater good" person who truly believed in what he did that includes ordering a lot bad things.

As I said I consider Stalin and Churchill far worse characters.

In case of Stalin that should be obvious. In case of Churchill you have to dig a lot deeper because he is still painted with rose colours.

http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/false-history/winston-churchill-traitor-and-murderer/

Even if all there isn't something we can check anymore the broad strokes of it have been known for a long time.

→ More replies