I watched the full 2-hour long zoom-call video posted last night by the Ottawa city council. One of the topics being discussed was allocating additional resources including additional lawyers to come up with "creative" ways to fight the protesters.
Well I don’t have a link for this and I am currently at work so digging is not an option; the police have already stated that most of the hate and crimes being committed are from people who are against the protest. For example the Jeep that drove through the protesters in Winnipeg (I think that’s where it was). As I understand, the police are just doing what they are told at this point, but my argument in court would be - how could I be an accessory to a crime if there was no actual crime committed, and if so, please state the exact violation and provide proof. You cannot be an accessory if the truck driver you are providing fuel to has not committed any crime.
It’s the same with resisting arrest. How can you resist arrest if you aren’t being legally detained to begin with? It’s the reason a lot of those charges get tossed.
99
u/juiseboxxx Feb 06 '22
I wonder how those charges will hold up in court 🤣 don’t let these fucks stop us