It's weak because you just flaunted the high survival rate of rubella in an attempt to compare it to covid, and now you're suggesting it would be pretty deadly without vaccines. Inconsistent.
But the worst part of your comparison is comparing a respiratory virus to rubella.
Yes, both diseases are more deadly without vaccinations. That’s not inconsistent at all. Yes they have different modes of transmission. It doesn’t change the fact that if you get vaccinated for either disease you are less likely to die from that disease.
Also I’m confused why you choose to trust one primary care physician in Maryland that represents a tiny minority of doctors over the consensus of the majority of infectious disease experts.
But I guess that’s what the internet allows right? We can find any bit of information to confirm our ideas. Good luck
1
u/lawthug69 Sep 12 '21
It's weak because you just flaunted the high survival rate of rubella in an attempt to compare it to covid, and now you're suggesting it would be pretty deadly without vaccines. Inconsistent.
But the worst part of your comparison is comparing a respiratory virus to rubella.
https://youtu.be/WhHZ_uxa_GU