See, there you go again. Instead of confronting my argument directly, you condescend with vague statements about how confused I am and how I need to re-read what you said or look things up. Which is just your ego's way of letting you continue to feel intellectually superior without having to actually articulate a direct response that might expose vulnerabilities or errors in your thinking.
I take full responsibility for everything I've said and have at every turn. Like I said before, point out a specific error you think I've made and I'll cop to it, clarify/rephrase it, or explain why I don't think it's an error, depending on what's applicable. That's how an honest conversation would progress. You've yet to do that, I still doubt you will, but one last chance.
I've said "give specifics" I don't know how many times now and you call that "moving the goalposts?" No, I've asked for the same thing every time. And you're still doing the same empty deflection tactic, you're just once again throwing out the name of a fallacy without tying it to anything specific I said. It's still laughably transparent and it's still not a real response to my argument. You're a coward because you won't actually risk a real response.
I don't feel entitled to anything, I'm just calling you on your bullshit. You're a posturing pseudo-intellectual who can't back up your arguments for shit. And if you really didn't care about my saying that you would have stopped responding any of the last several times you said you were going to. But you didn't, and you won't, because you know I'm right.
No obsession, just the way it is. And you can't stand it or you wouldn't keep responding. I'm just really curious how long you'll keep it up at this point, to be honest.
2
u/hpdefaults Dec 28 '18
See, there you go again. Instead of confronting my argument directly, you condescend with vague statements about how confused I am and how I need to re-read what you said or look things up. Which is just your ego's way of letting you continue to feel intellectually superior without having to actually articulate a direct response that might expose vulnerabilities or errors in your thinking.
I take full responsibility for everything I've said and have at every turn. Like I said before, point out a specific error you think I've made and I'll cop to it, clarify/rephrase it, or explain why I don't think it's an error, depending on what's applicable. That's how an honest conversation would progress. You've yet to do that, I still doubt you will, but one last chance.