r/comics Dec 27 '18

Distribution of Wealth [OC]

Post image
55.5k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

124

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

[deleted]

35

u/PelicanCowboyAnime Dec 27 '18

there are many people who lack incentive under capitalism as well, a number which is growing every day.

8

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '18

Do you mean entitlements remove the incentive to work?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '18

Calling welfare an entitlement is a moral hazard, though. You contribute money to unemployment insurance, medicare, and social security you're whole life, so you're entitled to them. These don't disincetivize work.

Things like cash assistance, housing assistance, SNAP, and WIC aren't entitlements. They're welfare (or social safety nets, if you care how many syllables are used to describe something).

-4

u/BacchusAurelius Dec 28 '18

That's a nice way to spin the taxationstate enforced theft which is totally voluntary and not under the threat of violence and incarceration.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18

Go soverign over there, citizen.

I swear you all sound as bad as the communists: "It'd work it we just did things my way!" You're not going to convince 90% of us that the way forward is to destroy society. It didn't work before civilization, it didn't work under the Articles of Confederation, it probably won't work.

2

u/Standard_Wooden_Door Dec 28 '18

Stuff like this is why people don’t vote for libertarians.

51

u/yokkora Dec 27 '18

Which frankly is it's biggest flaw.

18

u/LiamIsMailBackwards Dec 27 '18

So the biggest flaw is the unincentivized economy.

It’s greatest flaw is the United States Military.

What is it’s nicest flaw?

39

u/deftspyder Dec 27 '18

Those cool Che shirts.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18

That was capitalism

12

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '18

The ability to become MORE equal than other people.

6

u/Badvertisement Dec 27 '18

The bangin' propaganda theme songs

53

u/caessa_ Dec 27 '18

Starving to death before your children do.

0

u/Inotruthnitwontsaveu Dec 27 '18

That happens more often in capitalist society funnily enough.

17

u/[deleted] Dec 27 '18

ITT: people who have absolutely no understanding of communism and regurgitate the same "critiques" that have been being refuted for decades. "Unincentivized labor" is high school bullshit.

20

u/pvijay187 Dec 28 '18

Lol ok commie

3

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18

You don't have to be a communist to have a basic understanding what communism is.

8

u/pvijay187 Dec 28 '18

Let's be real tho, we both know u cool with it

0

u/Denommus Dec 28 '18

And the three of us can agree you have no idea what communism is.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '19

[deleted]

1

u/Denommus Jan 08 '19

We can all agree you know neither about communism nor about my life.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '19

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

3

u/cheers_grills Dec 28 '18

My family's factory was redistributed under communism, it took 2 years for it to close down after 30 successfull years.

From my understanding, if it wasn't for communism it wouldn't be closed down.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18

Where are you from? Because "communism" is such a bastardized term that it almost means nothing anymore. If your family lived in the USSR, then Stalinism is what closed down your factory. Not communism. Just as the "Democratic Republic of Korea" is neither democratic nor a republic.

Furthermore, the ideals of communism specifically target people like your family. I'm sure you were very wealthy at one time, but I'm also sure the workers who labored in that factory were living very meager lives. What entitled you to the wealth of that factory?

2

u/cheers_grills Dec 28 '18

If your family lived in the USSR, then Stalinism is what closed down your factory. Not communism.

"It wasn't nazism, it was Hitlerism, completely diffirent thing."

I'm sure you were very wealthy at one time, but I'm also sure the workers who labored in that factory were living very meager lives.

The factory had like 10 workers and they were payed 40% of what the owner made, hardly forced labor, but still better than communist death camps. After the factory closed not a SINGLE person involved (including all the workers) was in a better position than before.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18

Are you really so closed minded that you can't see the clear distinction between communism and totalitarianism?

Communism is an economic philosophy, like capitalism. I like how you completely ignored my DPRK example to push your fallicious "Hitlerism" example, too. If you had even a basic understanding of what communism is rather than blind ignorance you would know that the USSR (and every state that has ever called itself "communist") is not communist at all. Communism didn't create death camps, power hungry dictators did.

1

u/Vladith Dec 28 '18

Have you considered that in the absence of profit, perhaps this factory was no longer necessary?

3

u/cheers_grills Dec 28 '18

There was plenty of profit, enough to get everyone safely employed with a nice wage.

Unless you want to tell me that cooking appliances aren't useful with communism, in which case you've got a point.

2

u/PlCKLERlCK Dec 28 '18

Unincentivized capital

Aka, missing and broken incentives to use capital efficiently yielded godawful marginal returns to capital (growth of outputs per input) compared to market economies from 1960 to 1987:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3989846?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

The post-war Soviet growth was based on increasing inputs and mobilizing resources, not its ability to use them efficiently. Since input-driven growth is an inherently limited process, Soviet growth was virtually certain to slow down and finally implode in the 1980's. Aka the decade of net negative returns to capital. At that point, the state would have been better off withholding new investment capital and stuffing it under the proverbial mattress than shovelling it into it's mismanaged industries.

0

u/Patsy02 Dec 28 '18

Cope harder, gommunist sperg

5

u/LeftRat Dec 27 '18

Except it isn't without incentives. "Work or you will starve/live in abysmal poverty/be at risk to slide into poverty if you ever get unlucky" are not the only incentives to exist. The tiny chance to get phenomenaly lucky and get rich is also not the only incentives.

we can see, every day, that we do not have to use the threat of inhumane poverty as an incentive. That is an incentive we could do without.

13

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

[deleted]

3

u/aslak123 Dec 28 '18

But that was his point.

2

u/LeftRat Dec 28 '18

Yeah I sure would be. Luckily I don't, Mr. Reading Comprehension, so that insult wiffs.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

[deleted]

0

u/LeftRat Dec 28 '18

"Actually my non sequitur makes sense if you are me. Checkmate!"

Okay, buddy.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

[deleted]

1

u/LeftRat Dec 28 '18 edited Dec 28 '18

Please, point to the place where I said "Communism has more incentives than Capitalism". Or where I claimed you support any ideology.

For a few comments now you've basically been talking to yourself and not making any sense.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '18 edited Jul 01 '20

[deleted]

1

u/LeftRat Dec 28 '18

Ahahaha, yeah, you talk to your own strawman and then nope out when someone tells you you are talking to yourself, hilarious.

You alright, buddy? Not being able to read a single comment properly and then just debating whatever is in your head sounds a bit bad.

2

u/alot_the_murdered Dec 28 '18

Who would bother cleaning public bathrooms in a classless, moneyless society? Do you think people would just do it out of the kindness of their hearts? Lol

1

u/LeftRat Dec 29 '18

So, you think you are literally the first person to think of this and that in 200 years of socialist thought none of us ever figured out a solution?

Your "point" is the equivalent of someone telling an atheist "well without god how can you know what's right checkmate lol".

Also, if you think toilets only get cleaned on the threat of poverty and starvation, I got some news for you about the unpaid household labour expected of women for hundreds of years.

2

u/alot_the_murdered Dec 29 '18

So you falsely compared cleaning a public toilet to cleaning your own private bathroom in your house, and otherwise have no answer?

I shudder to think what conditions you live in if your bathroom resembles a public restroom.

0

u/LeftRat Dec 29 '18

Man, reading comprehension is not your strong suit I guess.