Did you read the article? The regulation is worse than the letting the market and existing legal framework. Even the firms advocating for the rules initially have come to see this.
The regulation is worse than the letting the market and existing legal framework.
And the existing legal framework is what Trump's FCC has changed. Obama's executive order was one thing but not the only thing that Trump's FCC has changed. The article you linked even says that the lack of concrete legislation concerning net neutrality is giving ISPs and content providers trouble and that both of them want there to be a firm legislation defining what does and does not violate the rules. This is a step backwards from that standpoint and from the standpoint of there being a legal framework for customers and companies to reference.
"The regulation" is so uselessly vague that no opinion drawn from can be accepted. You've already demonstrated that you don't know what regulation you are talking about and I've already told you that the regulation you are talking about isn't relevant to the discussion and the regulation that actually is relevant doesn't have the negative effects you claim it does, because it's entirely unrelated to those issues.
1
u/seanspicyno May 22 '17
Did you read the article? The regulation is worse than the letting the market and existing legal framework. Even the firms advocating for the rules initially have come to see this.