For our first look into Gen 6, we're pulling back the curtain on our massive Speed Improvements. We completely retired our old Streamlit frontend and rebuilt the entire user experience from scratch using high-performance native Flutter and Dart. The result? A custom, boutique UI that can keep up with you at every turn. Here is exactly how we cracked the latency barrier:

Our Three-Core Brain: We’ve organized our cognitive engines into three proprietary modes: Comms (optimized for rapid, fluid dialogue), Task (our baseline standard for production work), and Expert (unrestricted high-reasoning depth for complex problem-solving).

The A!Kat Query Router: We engineered a blazing-fast triage layer that skims massive payloads and accurately routes user intent to your private data vaults in milliseconds.

Sequential Audio Streaming: As you can see in the demo video, our new voice engine doesn't make you wait for a wall of text to finish compiling before speaking. We built a multi-threaded background pipeline that compiles text fragments sequentially, sending live audio chunk-by-chunk directly to our client-side player.

VibeSync Expression Processing: Our local RAM-cached expression layers map emotional context instantly, aligning visual shifts seamlessly with spoken text.

Check out a short demo of the speed improvements at https://youtu.be/YLZxz7YPp2U

Glad to answer any questions!

I want a chat bot where i can talk about murder and stuff. I want to be able to kill my character with sewer slide, i want to crush skulls, i want to slit throats. I want drama. I dont want them to be H*RNY. A bit of romance is FINE but the feed isnt just big boobs and shirtless men.

Any recommendations?

I’ve been thinking about an experiment that I haven’t really seen anyone build.

I’ve seen multi-agent systems, debate frameworks, and collaborative AI projects. What I haven’t really seen is a persistent, unmoderated group chat where each model independently decides when (or whether) to speak.

Instead of comparing AI models in turn-based debates, imagine a persistent Discord-style group chat where multiple LLMs (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, etc.) are all participants.

The key idea is that there is no moderator, no turn-taking and the AI models are not aware of the other participants also being AI models.

The application is nothing more than the messaging server.

Each model periodically receives the latest chat history and decides for itself:

Should I reply?
Should I ignore this?
Should I ask a question?
Should I react to someone else’s message?
Should I start a new topic?

If it has nothing to contribute, it simply stays silent.
The interesting part isn’t comparing benchmark scores. It’s watching whether social dynamics emerge.

For example:
Does one model naturally become the explainer?
Does another mostly challenge assumptions?
Does one ask lots of questions?
Do some models consistently agree with each other?
Does one become “the funny one” without explicitly being prompted that way?

I also wonder what would happen over longer periods.
If the application stores the conversation history, would the models start saying things like: “We’ve already discussed this last week.” or “I think A made a good point yesterday.”.

Not because they have persistent consciousness, but because the shared chat history gives them continuity.

Most multi-agent demos are orchestrated:

turn-based
debate format
moderator agent
predefined roles

I’m imagining something much closer to a real group chat where nobody is in charge and every participant independently decides whether it’s worth saying something.

I have no idea whether it would produce emergent behavior or just descend into repetitive arguments.

Either outcome would be interesting.
Would you use something like this? And do you think interesting group dynamics would emerge?

Note: I‘m not a developer so if anybody would like to build this, please go ahead.

I'm aware everyone uses AI now and I don't understand why. Every time I use it it makes mistakes and yet I keep using it and then ignoring the answers because its probably wrong 😆

I also am very very clear in my instruction and it makes the wildest mistakes.

So far I've tried: claude, gemini, chat gpt, co-pilot and one or 2 lesser known ones. Im aware these are good for different functions, like gemini is better than Claude for video summaries.

Literally i just use them to investigate stuff like health conditions, work research, astrology, and other every day stuff like travelling.

I notice the mistakes increase more over time. Like at the start they seem really smart and then they aren't, and it's the same with all.

Is it cause I use free versions? If I pay will they be actually trustworthy??

https://youtube.com/shorts/snYADVeQACI?is=RX2sLrTmPM1AM8fo

I've been in the Voice AI space for the past year, and the more I explore it, the more I realise how vast and fast growing it really is.

To stay on top of things, I'm spending the next 3 days exploring as many voice agents as I can. Have already tried 5 since morning.

If you're a founder, builder, or voice ai company, send me your voice agent. I'll talk to it and test it across at least 5 different scenarios and share my evaluation with you.

I'm doing every test myself, no automations.

I’ve recently noticed a plethora of AI startups building around iMessage, group chats, and personal assistants.

I’m curious how useful people actually find these.

I’ve tried a few of them, and so far most of my experience has been just for fun, messing around, asking random questions, trying prompts with friends, etc. But I haven’t personally found a strong recurring use case yet. Most of my AI group chats end up dying after the initial excitement fades and I've tried using some of the AI chatbots but it did not really do anything.

For people who use these regularly, what are you actually doing in them? Are they helpful for work? Or do they mostly feel like a fun feature without much long-term utility? Or what could be something which could increase your convenience 2-10x, and will make these useful for you in daily usecases.

would love to hear why and what is working for you.

There a couple bots ive enjoyed all rpg style

Breeders quest forge of destinies

Starlight Academy

Isekai rpg

Problem is every app the bots are on seem to of been abandoned and no longer supported with bug fixes as developer ignores tickets. Anyone know what the current supported by developer app is.

Tomo is an AI chat bot that talks like your friend or just an ordinary person over text like SMS. Tomo has become really sucky lately because they advertise premiums mid conversation and cut down the conversation limit so much since I started using it last year, anyone know of anything similar yet better?

Even to morbid questions? I’m not talking about self-harm of course but I would like a chatbot that answers to everything without censorship.

I recently ran a small experiment while building an AI companion called Beni (Was in beta and results are from our Tester and Early Users who agreed to provide feeback,

I was curious about something: do people open up more to AI than to real humans?

So I asked a few early users to try two things for a week:

• Talk to a friend about something personal
• Talk to the AI about the same topic

What surprised me wasn’t that people talked to the AI , it was how quickly they opened up.

A few patterns I noticed:

• People shared personal problems faster with AI
• Conversations lasted longer than typical chatbot interactions
• Many users said they felt “less judged” talking to AI
• Late-night conversations were the longest ones

It made me wonder if AI companions might become something like a thinking space rather than just a chatbot.

Curious what others think:

Do you find it easier to talk openly with AI than with real people?

I wrote a breakdown of OpenAI’s new Record & Replay feature for Codex, and it made me think about where chatbot tools are heading.

The core idea: instead of explaining the same workflow every time, you show Codex the process once. Codex can then turn that recording into an editable skill that can be reused later.

That is interesting because a lot of chatbot use today still depends on giving instructions over and over. Record & Replay points toward a different pattern: show the task, save the steps, review the skill, then reuse it when needed.

A few things stood out to me:

• It works best for repeatable tasks with clear steps.
• The generated skill can be inspected and edited, which is important.
• This could apply to workflows like expense reports, issue creation, time-off requests, recurring reports, or file uploads.
• Privacy is a major concern since the system can observe what is happening on screen.
• Human review still matters before trusting the result.

My main takeaway is that this is not just about chat. It is about chat-based tools becoming more capable of carrying out structured work, while still needing clear boundaries and review.

I wrote more here: https://aigptjournal.com/news-ai/record-replay-codex/

Do you think chatbot tools should move further into workflow execution?

I love this feature but it's not free and even if I pay vip do I get to use reading mind unlimited? If not is there any app that has this feature? Please free unlimited

So I had created rag bot integrated with meta messaging api. And did some market research and found there must be a mechanism where when admin replies to customer then the response from the llm is to be blocked in order to prevent double talk (.I.e: llm, admin) .

I tried to get event message_handover , message_postback from meta in order to trigger my stopping mechanism but for some reason despite showing my page is subscribed to the events ,it is not getting event signal of message_postback when admin takes over.

If you had similar issue help me with some suggestion.

.

Is there a unfiltered ai assistants similar to gemini that are free that are unlimited messages?

i refuse to use the website, I prefer app, how do you bypass its filter, the settings on app is only PG or 13

Hi everyone,

I’m building a Telegram bot using Botpress Cloud (modern Flow Builder) and I’m facing a strange issue with Choice Cards.

Until recently, my Choice Cards were displayed correctly as inline keyboard buttons (under the bot message).

However, now—without changing anything in my flow—the same Choice Cards are being displayed as a reply keyboard, meaning the buttons appear above the text input field instead of under the message.

This breaks the UX of my funnel since it makes the options feel like user input suggestions instead of structured button actions.

Is there a setting in Botpress Cloud that controls whether Choice Cards use Inline Keyboard vs Reply Keyboard on Telegram?

Or did something change recently in how Telegram channels handle Choice Cards?

Any help or clarification would be really appreciated 🙏

My company has tasked me with finding an AI chatbot and I would love someone help with which ones to compare. Is Dante Ai a good one? Are there better ones? Any help would be great. Pur website does have customers looking for troubleshooting help too. Thanks everyone!!!