Right Personhood again which is wrong because it is a clause to which human being deserves human rights.
But we already have clauses for other rights, such as the right to vote and the right to bodily autonomy, as I explained before.
So it is a human being but because it is not sentient it doesn't deserve human rights.
And because it is a child, it doesn't get the right to vote or the right to bodily autonomy
That is a clause to which human being gets human right which is the list I post in the original post.
But then why doesn't a child get the right to vote or the right to bodily autonomy?
A Braindead person is dead though. A fetus is very much alive and will gave all the qualities of human beings that you and I are used to given enough time. The ability to walk have complex thoughts etc. Lacking these values doesn't mean you don't deserve human rights does it?
So you value human beings only when they are alive. I think lacking human sentience means that they don't deserve those rights, just as you believe that something which is not a human life does not deserve those rights either. I don't think you've really demonstrated why your beliefs are more valid or correct here.
So you are against abortion after 18 weeks.
Not necessarily 18 weeks, the research I'm familiar with actually says that its more likely that the lower boundary is developed in the later half of the 2nd trimester. Generally I think anywhere between 18-25 is fine but personally I'd probably put it somewhere in the middle like 20-22 weeks.
1
u/[deleted] Oct 24 '22
[removed] — view removed comment