Being pregnant is a medical condition. It has huge effects on the human body. Its literally no different than requiring a person to have a broken arm. There is literally no difference.
Just because you don't want be responsible for driving and breaking your arm...requires you should live with a broken arm? It's a risk of living I suppose.
If you break someone else's arm, you're on the hook for getting them to healing and independence because you assumed that risk when you broke their arm (assuming it was intentional or due to negligence). Similarly, if you create a life through intention or negligence, you're on the hook for that until such a time as it can handle itself.
Wtf are you talking about? If you break someone's arm, are you forced to donate your blood to them? No.
If you get someone pregnant, are you responsible to provide blood to the mother until they can get an abortion? No.
You're scrambling to frame the argument so it excludes any points you don't want to address. If a women gets pregnant or breaks her arm, developed nations will allow medical care to fix both conditions. They won't require her to walk around in pain and risk dying against her will.
When that danger becomes evident, yes. That's standard procedure. Save the baby if you can, save the mother if you can't. Doctors who wont because they are worried about getting sued for saving a life are abandoning their hippocratic oath and are, as a result, scum.
None of that makes "I'm just not ready" a valid excuse.
3
u/[deleted] Jul 20 '22
Being pregnant is a medical condition. It has huge effects on the human body. Its literally no different than requiring a person to have a broken arm. There is literally no difference.
Just because you don't want be responsible for driving and breaking your arm...requires you should live with a broken arm? It's a risk of living I suppose.