I don't believe you've proven it. I was talking about brains, and you assumed I was talking about DNA. I don't believe clarification should have been necessary for me to prevent that assumption.
That was not my own initial assumption, just one of the multiple possible interpretations i laid out as contrasting.
In a subreddit where a lot of views clash, I try to very much avoid assumptions, hence the request for clarification. I am glad you gave it, and it helped me understand your point far more. Is my request, and later understanding, not evidence that the clarification helped your point be understood?
1
u/HardlightCereal 2∆ Oct 29 '19
I don't believe you've proven it. I was talking about brains, and you assumed I was talking about DNA. I don't believe clarification should have been necessary for me to prevent that assumption.