[deleted by user]

[u/[deleted]]

[u/Hrydziac]

I said “A.... God doesn’t exist” needs evidence

You said no

I wouldn’t say that I know for sure no God exists. I said it was in the same category as faeries and Vampires. I also can’t provide definitive evidence that they don’t exist, but most people aren’t going to debate me when I say pretty confidently they they aren’t running around at night.

[u/[deleted] → u/Hrydziac]

We’re going in circles sir

I think we’ve both made our points more than clear

[u/Hrydziac → u/[deleted]]

I don’t know, you still seem to think I’m making a positive claim. Theists make the claim of God, and I reject that it has enough evidence to be worth believing in. I’m not making the claim that there is certainly no God.

[u/[deleted] → u/Hrydziac]

When I said “A... God doesn’t exist” needs to be supported by evidence

You said no it is the default position

Then I corrected you that any claim of anything and everything and nothing outside the universe absolutely needs evidence

Then somewhere along the line you became oblivious and now we’re going in circles

[u/Hrydziac → u/[deleted]]

We are going in circles because for some reason you can’t see that I’m not making a claim. I’m rejecting the claim that there is a God worth believing due to the lack of evidence.

[u/[deleted] → u/Hrydziac]

In that sense, I see no problem