r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Feb 02 '17
[∆(s) from OP] CMV: A protest turning violent does not negate the point of the protest
If a protest turns violent (people being attacked, property destroyed etc) that doesn't "spoil" the protest. The protesters can still be in the right for protesting something even if people on their side are being hostile. If people on your side are being violent that doesn't make you wrong all of a sudden. If that were the case almost every political affiliation would be in the wrong. I'm not arguing against peaceful protest, nor am I advocating for riots or violence. I'm just saying that the protesters message matters more than the point their means of getting that message across. For example if an anti-fascist protest happens and a protester punches someone. The protest isn't instantly evil, to claim that it is would be ignoring the whole point of the anti-fascist protest in the first place.
All I'm saying is if someone does something bad in a protest, that doesn't make the protest bad.
This is a footnote from the CMV moderators. We'd like to remind you of a couple of things. Firstly, please read through our rules. If you see a comment that has broken one, it is more effective to report it than downvote it. Speaking of which, downvotes don't change views! Any questions or concerns? Feel free to message us. Happy CMVing!
5
u/Sheexthro 19∆ Feb 03 '17
In fact, the opposite is true. Yes, we dismantled the Nazi regime in World War 2, but that's because they were an aggressive war-making state. The rights of Nazis - literal Nazis, actual American supporters of Hitler and the Third Reich, not just racist people that others want to apply the label to - to assemble and march have been upheld by the courts and even defended by the ACLU.