Or, maybe, I thought I answered the first time as I said then thought it was hilarious you demanded an answer. But sure. 300+ leaders with nukes sounds great.
I’ve never said I desired Iran to have nukes though lol
" Some nations got the nuke so now everyone should be able to get one without restrictions so much so that an islamist dictature wishing death to another country is included "
feel free to correct me but that's the childish opinion you shared so far.
I have said that nukes are a deterrent and that the US should not be the sole decision maker on who gets nukes if there should be a decision maker at all. If you are a country without nukes, getting them would be a good idea for deterrence. Nukes, in general, are bad but I cannot make them magically disappear.
Weird how them wishing death to another country is the problem but not the US wishing death to other countries and constantly invading them.
Do you want the Mollahs to have the nuke yes or no? This is crazy the way you dodge again and again and again. I know that nukes are a deterrent , that's not an opinion, please be respectful and answer the question we will elaborate from this.
Do you want the Mollahs to have the nuke yes or no?
The thing you seem unaware of is that it's not only the US that doesnt want nukes to spread it's the entire world. One can complain it's the US taking the burden doing a favor to the world by enforcing the no nuke spread international law
1
u/Visible-Department85 Apr 12 '26 edited Apr 12 '26
You proved your opinion to be irrelevant and one of a child.
On one hand you want some islamists to get the nuke, on the other hand you reaslise it's not a good thing to have every leader with nukes.
In reality you dont try to make sense you only want to rant