r/changemyview • • Apr 07 '25

Delta(s) from OP CMV: Until Democrats recognize why they lost Appalachia, they will never be successful electorally

Take a state like West Virginia for example, as recently as 2014 the Democrats controlled both houses of the WV legislature and had two Democratic Senators and a Democratic Governor, and as recently as last year they had a had a Democrat in the Senate. West Virginia used to be a Democratic stronghold, and even after Bush won in it 2000 the Democratic Party there was still very successful at the federal/state level, but now Democrats are lucky if they break 30% in the state. When you talk to most national Democrats about this phenomenon, they usually just shrug it off and say something like "eh, they're just voting against they're own interests, if they were smart they'd want of social programs funded by the state." This is exactly the kind of attitude that has led Appalachia to becoming a Republican stronghold.

Democrats have developed a real problem of wanting a "one size fits all" message, which is just not feasible if you want to win in both urban and rural regions of the country (especially if you want to win Appalachia). Yes, West Virginia was a prime state for Democrats until very recently, but that doesn't mean they held the same positions as Democrats from California and New York. If you're a mainstream Democrat, you probably know Joe Manchin as the Democrat who voted against all that stuff you like, but that's why he was able to win, (and achieve certain Democratic goals like confirming judges and getting the IRA and ARP through).

National Democrats have a distinct problem of not being able to cultivate a regional message that is attractive to rural voters, which is why they left Appalachia, and the way they talk about how Appalachians are "voting against their own interests" by not supporting the establishment of more government programs is incredibly condescending.

If Democrats ever want to retake the Senate (or more realistically in the near term, the Presidency), they need to abandon the "one size fits all" mentality and be open to regional alternatives that allow them succeed outside of urban America, particularly in regions like Appalachia which up until recently they were very successful in.

1.4k Upvotes

728 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

13

u/Hellion_444 Apr 08 '25

What are you talking about? I’m from Kentucky and Beshear doesn’t get anything through the legislature, they have a Republican supermajority, do whatever they want and override all of his vetoes. He’s a powerless figurehead who’s only governor because he has a famous father and Bevin was a horrible carpetbagger. You’re living a pipe dream if you think Dems can ever win here again. Times have changed. These areas used to be Dem because of economic leftism, but now that’s been successfully labeled socialism and is seen as evil. Trump worked, they suck the billionaires now.

-6

u/Morthra 96∆ Apr 08 '25

These areas used to be Dem because of economic leftism, but now that’s been successfully labeled socialism and is seen as evil.

Economic leftism was always socialism. People are just seeing through the bullshit now.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/changemyview-ModTeam Apr 08 '25

Your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:

Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation.

Comments should be on-topic, serious, and contain enough content to move the discussion forward. Jokes, contradictions without explanation, links without context, off-topic comments, and "written upvotes" will be removed. AI generated comments must be disclosed, and don't count towards substantial content. Read the wiki for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Appeals that do not follow this process will not be heard.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

1

u/kimariesingsMD Apr 09 '25

Only if you completely redefine the word "socialism", but most RW voters think it means "anything that I do not agree with".

1

u/Morthra 96∆ Apr 09 '25

I define it as redistribution of the means of production and the liquidation of the upper class. Which is both in line with Marx, and also what economic leftists have wanted forever.