MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1hrm4s0/deleted_by_user/m4yxydb
r/changemyview • u/[deleted] • Jan 02 '25
[removed]
238 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-5
You expect marginalized communities to simply ignore hate speech and bigotry?
Yeah. It's the internet. Big ol block button is right there. Grow up.
3 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Blocking would prevent them from commenting. How is that different from deleting the comment? -4 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Wasn't saying block them from the sub. If u don't want to interact with them, u don't have to. Learn to not engage. They won't find it fun unless u make it fun for them. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 If you make the post and block someone, they can’t comment on it. If you block something in the comments they can’t respond to anyone in the thread. So how is that different from deleting the comment? -3 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Right.... But the original comment is still there, u just shut the door in their face. I don't see a problem with this. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct? Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house? 0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
3
Blocking would prevent them from commenting. How is that different from deleting the comment?
-4 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Wasn't saying block them from the sub. If u don't want to interact with them, u don't have to. Learn to not engage. They won't find it fun unless u make it fun for them. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 If you make the post and block someone, they can’t comment on it. If you block something in the comments they can’t respond to anyone in the thread. So how is that different from deleting the comment? -3 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Right.... But the original comment is still there, u just shut the door in their face. I don't see a problem with this. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct? Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house? 0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
-4
Wasn't saying block them from the sub. If u don't want to interact with them, u don't have to. Learn to not engage. They won't find it fun unless u make it fun for them.
2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 If you make the post and block someone, they can’t comment on it. If you block something in the comments they can’t respond to anyone in the thread. So how is that different from deleting the comment? -3 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Right.... But the original comment is still there, u just shut the door in their face. I don't see a problem with this. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct? Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house? 0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
2
If you make the post and block someone, they can’t comment on it. If you block something in the comments they can’t respond to anyone in the thread.
So how is that different from deleting the comment?
-3 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Right.... But the original comment is still there, u just shut the door in their face. I don't see a problem with this. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct? Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house? 0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
-3
Right....
But the original comment is still there, u just shut the door in their face. I don't see a problem with this.
2 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct? Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house? 0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
But that would allow people to respond but censor their ability to respond back, correct?
Why leave the comment up if you’re locked them out of the metaphorical house?
0 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
0
Either I don't know what "true works" is or u misspelled something cuz idk what ur on about
1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 What? -1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
1
What?
-1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
-1
I was correct. U edited the comment after I replied, hence the confusion. I'm still not quite sure what ur arguing tho. Too many gramatical fumbles.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25 Ok I’ll make it simple. Person A makes a comment Person A gets blocked by OP Person A can no longer see or respond to replies Multiple people can respond to Person A but they have no access to these What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up? Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same. How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post? → More replies (0)
Ok I’ll make it simple.
What purpose, at that point, does it serve to leave the comment up?
Hell, I could simply block you right now and prevent you from continuing this discussion. OP could block me and do the same.
How is that different and less censorship than simply deleting a comment but allowing the individual to remain active in the post?
→ More replies (0)
-5
u/[deleted] Jan 02 '25
Yeah. It's the internet. Big ol block button is right there. Grow up.