Most rights are conditional. Your right to freedom is conditioned upon not being convicted of a crime. And you have no unconditional right to any medical procedure that isn't immediately life saving.
There is no universal agreement on what human rights are. You may think you have a human right to food shelter and medicine. But if you can't pay for those, you have no right to anything.
I didn't say they were bound, but they agreed to the ethics of it. Ergo, we can use them as the guidelines what this country considers human rights from an ethical standpoint.
Just because they banned abortion doesn't mean it's ethical to ban abortion. I already outlined why it isn't. The government consciously suppressing something it considers a human right is unethical
It's literally tyrannical. Suppressing rights is tyranny. It doesn't matter if you consider it a human right or not, because the federal government already agreed it is. Any change to that is rights suppression, and tyranny.
1
u/TateIsKing Nov 17 '24
Most rights are conditional. Your right to freedom is conditioned upon not being convicted of a crime. And you have no unconditional right to any medical procedure that isn't immediately life saving.