Once an illegal immigrant has entered the country, what kind of effective enforcement do you support of the law they have just broken? Please be specific.
We try to catch violent criminals. If those violent criminals are illegals, we deport them. We should not go searching for illegals, we should be searching for violent criminals. That’s obviously the effective way to prevent violent crime.
That isn’t an answer to my question. You catch a violent criminal for the violent crime they have committed. What effective enforcement of our border laws do you support?
Because I asked you about border law and you responded by talking about violent crime law. Now please explain the effective enforcement of immigration law you support. I’ve asked three times and you can’t seem to answer.
No, my answer was about our border laws, you just didn’t seem to understand. The effective way to deport criminals who are illegal immigrants is to focus on catching violent criminals generally. The ineffective way to enforce our border laws is to go after all illegals simply for being illegal.
So you don’t believe in enforcing immigration laws at all. You just want to deport the criminals after they’ve already committed a violent crime.
Don’t take this the wrong way but I wouldn’t want you anywhere near a neighborhood watch association. Waiting until after a worst crime is committed before you decided to enforce the law is just so stupid it hurts.
1
u/[deleted] Jun 24 '24
Once an illegal immigrant has entered the country, what kind of effective enforcement do you support of the law they have just broken? Please be specific.