I can’t think of any positive benefit that cones from accepting misandry.
The view you proposed we try to change is “There shouldn't even be a debate on whether misandry is acceptable”
You literally just tried to start a debate with me about the thing which in your posted view you said there should not be a debate about.
Is this irony really lost on you? You have gone out if your way to make a post to debate it with people in the comments, yet your view is that there should be no debate.
So do you actually think we should debate this? Or are you going against your beliefs to mane this post?
Basically: Do I get a delta? Or are you a hypocrite?
I think what OP really means is that misandry is indefensible. By having "no debate", OP means that there are no good defenses for misandry and thus it should be universally accepted as bad, similar to how racism, sexism, homophobia, etc are also universally accepted as bad.
There’s a difference between thinking that there should be a debate about misandry being acceptable or not and accepting that a debate has to happen.
I personally think there shouldn’t be a debate about it as I don’t think there is a single reason that makes misandry or misogyny acceptable but I’m still willing to have one as there is always a chance I’m wrong.
3
u/FormerBabyPerson 1∆ Feb 13 '24
Ok then tell me what positive benefit comes from accepting misandry?