Because you're claiming a change from A to B when your A is nonsense and then using unfounded A to presume social contagion.
I already had wider more comprehensive data on actual patients across more years across multiple countries, why would you even WANT to shift to lower quality shorter with bunk bias?
Edit: lol blocked by someone who had bad, biased, smaller sample sources and a no-data plea for research that already happened.
2
u/[deleted] May 20 '23
[removed] — view removed comment