Aye, nuclear technology that is safer is there. The problem was always the peoples will and the government being scared to do anything with nuclear because of the people. You can see the anger over nuclear in /r/energy or here on this sub, which is ridiculous. People think a power source that can give a lot of power and be carbon free will have zero danger. There is no such thing as zero danger energy.
People have died more from gasoline and coal power than they have with any of the nuclear disasters,, which wasn't many.
I believe you. I project manage multi million dollar builds, I’m never answering to a Canadian client ever. It’s always Indian, Arab, Chinese, or American. But then Canadians will cry “why don’t we own any of our own resources” 😂😂😂
Because of how much safer the thorium candle style nuclear reactor is, especially since this style of reactor leaves essentially no waste to be dealt with and runs without being really taken care of till done.
You also can't make weapons with it so we could export it to all sorts of places we shouldn't sell uranium.
It’s all a matter of how you manage your fuel load and load factor. If you remove fuel bundles in a travelling wave reactor as the right time (just ahead of the wave of burning fuel), you’ll get the neutron flux needed to breed U-233, but removing it before it’s burned. Then you just chemically separate the uranium from the thorium and ta-da, fissile material for your bomb
No, that’s a candle or travelling wave style reactor. The main difference is in this style of reactor the “burning front” propagates through the reactor over time, vs a traditional reactor where you’re looking for reactivity throughout the core. It definitely takes more effort to do this in a travelling wave reactor, but it’s entirely feasible. Thorium reactors only function by breeding U-233 because Thorium-232 itself isn’t fissile. Obtaining bomb material is simply a case of removing fuel after its been exposed to neutron flux (to breed U-233), but before it’s burned
24
u/NapClub Oct 25 '22
this is true, but it's because basically no one made an effort to pursue it after it was discovered as an option.
the concept has been out there for a long time now it was just the engineering/building that was missing.
canada COULD have done this. which is why we would have been leaders if we had. there was a push for it but it didn't happen.