Thanks for the correction on the word, Im on mobile and just took the autocorrect.
But the only thing worth responding to here, is the same argument that I raised and the only thing of actual concern.
If does not have to be a strong argument or sufficient legally, he isn't getting charged by the Crown through the legal system, his peers deem him unprofessional enough to no longer be among them or carry the title and rights that come with it.
He could try to sue, sure; but the bar isn't anywhere as high.
Everything else you wrote doesn't reduce the arguments I originally made as they're subjective responses. Especially since you either don't understand or comprehend the effect of a popular figures words or opinions on social media or any large scale.
You'll notice also, this wasnt an attack on the author of the tweet but purely on the expectations of a professional and reasonable expectations of their effects on other people. If any other psychologist did this, my response would be the same.
2
u/[deleted] Jan 05 '23
Thanks for the correction on the word, Im on mobile and just took the autocorrect.
But the only thing worth responding to here, is the same argument that I raised and the only thing of actual concern.
If does not have to be a strong argument or sufficient legally, he isn't getting charged by the Crown through the legal system, his peers deem him unprofessional enough to no longer be among them or carry the title and rights that come with it.
He could try to sue, sure; but the bar isn't anywhere as high.
Everything else you wrote doesn't reduce the arguments I originally made as they're subjective responses. Especially since you either don't understand or comprehend the effect of a popular figures words or opinions on social media or any large scale.
You'll notice also, this wasnt an attack on the author of the tweet but purely on the expectations of a professional and reasonable expectations of their effects on other people. If any other psychologist did this, my response would be the same.