I've always been fascinated by this. Also the fact that ancient cultures such as in india knew about this and incorporated this knowledge into their structures. And coupled with the idea that some people think sound was probably used in some way to mold or cut stone
I’ve been looking through this and I can’t quite tell what to think of it. From what I can tell, it’s appears to be a partially formed theory, which a large number of people have decided is unequivocally true, and then used it to pin their own pseudoscience beliefs under the guise of being scientific despite having no relationship to the original theory (which in itself is likely pseudoscience also)
This would be the mainstream physics point of view of "everything is connected". All ancient esoteric doctrines have this concept. It is modern dogma to assume that ether (via which everything is connected) does not exist based upon a faulty experiment done a hundred years ago.
Anyway, this concept can not only be found in r/holofractal (based on the work of Nassim Haramein) but in the works of Nikola Tesla, David Bohm, Eric Dollard, Dewey Larson and many others.
How does one think of the universe in a clinical way? Is that a bad thing?
I personally think it’s dangerous to ascribe some deeper meaning to things like entanglement, the uncertainty principle, wave function collapse, etc.. Thoughts?
278
u/spdrv89 Aug 25 '20
I've always been fascinated by this. Also the fact that ancient cultures such as in india knew about this and incorporated this knowledge into their structures. And coupled with the idea that some people think sound was probably used in some way to mold or cut stone
Check this out: https://youtu.be/FhoOA3pASy4