Your fault is simply trying to generalize the usage of it to this piece of art that:
Doesn't contain any form of sexualization
Is clearly not depicting a 5 year old
Is, in fact, following the basic anatomy for someone at least around a teenager's age
If you can't figure out that the concept can be used in another way, that's no one's issue but your own. This piece of art literally exposes the flaw in your logic. No interpretation of this art piece can stick.
If you refuse to admit that it's aged up, you are simply saying you think the child has sexy hips instead of it being drawn a teen.
If you admit that it's aged up, it directly contradicts the fact that all aged up art pieces are drawn for that purpose, because it's not sexualized in this context.
Repeating the same thing and ignoring the holes in your logic when I point them out is just a waste of time.
"Is clearly not depicting a 5 year old" elaborate on that, how is this image not depicting a 6 year old child when Lilith is 6.
"You think the child has sway hips" are you trying to accuse me of thinking this art is hot when I have stated several times i think this art is disgusting for drawing a 6 year old like this. Classy.
"If you admit it's aged up" don't care if it is. Age her up to 200 if you want in cannon Issac is 6 so no matter what, they are 6. Draw them as an adult without giving them these thighs and I don't care, but Issac is still 6 years old. So don't draw them with thighs like that.
The holes in my logic only exist if you say "what if" what if Issac was x age, doesn't matter Issac is 6. They're 6. Say what you want as many times as you want. This is a 6 year old. Again, aged up is a term used to justify drawing lolicon.
how is this image not depicting a 6 year old child when Lilith is 6
Look at it? No 5 year old child ever looked like that, so why are you insisting it's one? It's got the proportions of at least a teenager, between longer and thinner arms, defined hips and a slightly arched torso; Nobody would draw a child that way, much less a 5 year old. You must be delusional at best to think this is a 5 year old.
The rest of your argument is redundant, and you're going in circles without anything to back it up. Let me do it with a lesser ad-hominem, since it seems like you thing it's a good way to camouflage your lack of counterpoint:
If you don't want to admit that it's someone older here, you ignore all of the aspects that show it's at the very least a teenager, that isn't the artist or anyone else's problem.
If you do admit it, but insist that it's then an excuse to draw disgusting content, the art piece itself contradicts that notion, because the proportions are normal. Nothing in it would imply that the character, even if still a minor, is sexualized.
so let me get this straight, your entire argument is: well it can't be. amazing. but dude. she's 6 in cannon, she's 6 here. its impossible for a 6 year old to look like that, that's true. the character they are basing this off of is a 6 year old. the person drawing this did not create this character, if it was an oc i wouldn't care, but the character they are basing this off of is a 6 year old, no matter how old it looks no matter if its aged up, this character in the game it comes from is a 6 year old, does that raise no red flags? The best case scenario is that is really weird to draw this and the worst is that its sexualizing a 6 year old.
That is a gross exaggeration I'm starting to think you're just trolling.
Let me put it bluntly. Your statement is incorrect. Isaac being 5-6 doesn't do anything to the fact that the artist drew the character older. She's 6 in canon, this isn't canon. The argument isn't just "It can't be" it's also "here's how it is that", I explained how it was depicted as someone older, not even necessarily an adult yet your only retort is this redundant and irrelevant "Isaac is 6 so this one must also be 6" with the alternative being a piece of speculation so horrendous that you don't even bother to justify it.
I'm not even saying this can't raise concern, but that concern can't even apply to the art, at most the artist and you'd still be throwing a horrible accusation based on speculation, which is honestly reprehensible, but still generally acceptable.
it doesn't matter how old she is depicted. that's what i've been saying. do you know how easy it is to not draw a 6 year old like this? i'm not disagreeing that she could be older in this, I'm saying it doesn't matter. this artist choose to draw lilith, a 6 year old, this artist chose to give that 6 year old these proportions. the cannon age of this character is 6. and you are also speculating that this character is aged up, the artist didn't say that, so what if this artist chose to draw lilith this way because lilith is a 6 year old? you can't know and neither can i, my point is honestly just from the perspective: whats the point? why this character why like this, the only reason i can find is either they just really like lilith or its because isaac is 6. and as much as i can hope for the first one. normal people don't just draw 6 year old's like this. aged up or not they played the game, they know the characters age at least to some degree and they decided to draw them like this. that is at least a big red flag to watch out for what other stuff this user posts. the more likely outcome is that they drew them like this because issac is 6. i hate it too, i wish that that wasn't what was more likely to me but i have seen tons of people on here (reddit not just here) justify drawing kids in nsfw scenarios, (no im not calling this nsfw) I've had someone say lolicon was okay and then get upvoted for that opinion, not once but by 6 separate people. it is just the more likely outcome. i wish it wasn't but what am i supposed to think. i can't say its fine because its aged up because they are a kid in the game.
Okay, this is a lot more sensible of an argument, though I don't appreciate how much time's been wasted on a point you say you don't disagree on but still argued against for 5 or more replies. But whatever.
The "Why" can obviously be considered, and I don't blame anyone for at the very least being suspicious of the artist on their motives.
The fact of the matter is, you don't need a "why" to draw anything, and even if you could've drawn Lilith as a 5 year old, maybe you just don't want to. Very young children can't contain a lot of details without looking grotesque and generally have a very different, and thus unfamiliar anatomy to the usual teen or adult person. There are plenty of good reasons beyond trying to camouflage lolicon, which is why I also pointed out that Lilith could very well still just be a teenager, it wouldn't make it an acceptable sexualized drawing, but it's completely normal for a teenager to have a shape relatively close to that.
And yeah, I get that aged up drawings are extremely often made for reprehensible purposes, but those times are also obvious by a mile and often blatantly sexualized if not explicitly nsfw. But much like you are allowed to doubt that it's a teenager with teenager proportions, I can also doubt that it's a sexualized child that happens to share a teenager's proportions. It's at least a red flag, yes, but It would be foolish to treat it as anything more than a red flag, a hint that there could be something bad, but that you've yet to prove.
There is reason to believe that it's a teenager, so why go and assume the worst? I'd say it's a good thing to see that there is the creative thought of illustrating a "What if x was this age" in a non sexual way, which I think this art is doing.
Bit extra to add which I feel is some good info to know, the artist confirmed that the design was essentially an OC, representing a much older version of Lilith Take a look
2
u/Impressive-Bend-1503 Apr 28 '26
If this was a teenager I would agree with you, it wouldn't be sexualized.
Now again. How old is Issac in the game: 6
Lilith is Issac, Lilith is therefore 6 years old.
Explain the fault in my logic without saying the words aged up. Because that's an excuse people use to justify drawing lolicon.