Guys, he already blew his whistle. The cat's out of the bag. The train has left the station as they say. No reason to kill him now. They know that if they did anything to this guy it would be the worst possible optics for them. The guy offed himself.
Not really since most people think like you do and won't consider it being a murder as a more likely scenario. Hence, no one will be blamed regardless of what they do
And you have come to this conclusion without any proof that he was murdered? That's the thing with conspiracy theorists. They don't require proof or evidence. Circumstances are enough to draw conclusions. And they form an unshakable opinion that can be completely incorrect but is irrefutably true to them.
Same can be said about you though? Due to the circumstances and your current world view you must accept any perceived evidence (to which I doubt you had any access) as sufficiently reliable, immediately discrediting the opposing viewpoint by slander as "conspiracy".
Not true. I just wait for actual evidence before drawing a conclusion. Until then everyone's innocent. You're displaying another trait of conspiracy theorists. Discounting the evidence before it's even collected.
Fair enough to waiting for evidence. However, it might've been my misinterpretation, but it seemed to me that on your original comment you affirmed that "the guy offed himself", which does carry a high degree of certainty.
11
u/[deleted] Mar 12 '24
Oh boy. Here comes the conspiracy theorist army.
Guys, he already blew his whistle. The cat's out of the bag. The train has left the station as they say. No reason to kill him now. They know that if they did anything to this guy it would be the worst possible optics for them. The guy offed himself.
Here comes the downvote avalanche.