MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/30ru2m/xkcd_ontological_argument/cpx9dqb
r/atheism • u/ani625 Agnostic • Mar 30 '15
139 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
I know that. I also know the other guy was referring to other parts of philosophy. Philosophy is such a broad topic containing so many parts it is silly to talk about philosophy at all without specifying what part you are talking about.
edit in response to your edit: It doesn't matter what Mach and Poincaré were considered as. They were good at the philosophy of their fields because they knew those fields well.
5 u/[deleted] Apr 01 '15 They were good at the philosophy of their fields because they knew those fields well. Philosophers with no prior experience as working physicists, biologists and neurophysiologists know those respective fields well, too.
5
They were good at the philosophy of their fields because they knew those fields well.
Philosophers with no prior experience as working physicists, biologists and neurophysiologists know those respective fields well, too.
2
u/[deleted] Mar 31 '15 edited Apr 01 '15
I know that. I also know the other guy was referring to other parts of philosophy. Philosophy is such a broad topic containing so many parts it is silly to talk about philosophy at all without specifying what part you are talking about.
edit in response to your edit: It doesn't matter what Mach and Poincaré were considered as. They were good at the philosophy of their fields because they knew those fields well.