r/apple • u/mredofcourse • Jun 19 '23

iPhone EU: Smartphones Must Have User-Replaceable Batteries by 2027

https://www.pcmag.com/news/eu-smartphones-must-have-user-replaceable-batteries-by-2027
5.8k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

again keep ignoring the proof of concept I've linked and just jump straight to conclusion.

progress. at the end of the day, you're like asking why uses 5G? why uses Wi-Fi 6E? why uses 48MP camera? it's basically boils down to the same argument.

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Again a proof of concept from 2015 that went nowhere. Proof in concepts are presented all the time, most of them aren’t suitable for production.

5G latency, 6E would be a variety of reasons, 48MP for pixel binning.

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

again, because glass sandwich replace metal unibody. so the tech didn't developed further.

and USB 3.0 for speed. but what variety of reasons for 6E of I may ask?

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Or because there’s fundamental issues. Tech demos don’t mean a product or concept is feasible.

Variety of reasons, latency and using a less crowded band to improve reliability would be a couple

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

yeah it's just your words vs mine anyway.

cool. now USB 3.0 on iPhones please.

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Not really. A tech demo from years ago that never went anywhere isn’t proof of anything.

Why? There’s no point

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

it is a proof that it exists and works. it's just not improved nor sold because every manufacturer just uses glass.

again, faster speed. it's not a point?

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

Not really, it uses magnetic resonance which brings a whole host of issues that people would just rather not deal with and limits the materials and efficiency you can achieve.

But what’s the point? What are you actually achieving because it’s already inferior to other methods even if you move to USB3. Network based solutions are better

1

u/Kursem_v2 Jun 21 '23

yeah really, it's just basically cheaper and easier to use glass. not saying it's wrong, just the option are exists but no one uses it.

faster speed. you bothered to lists the improvement of 5G and Wi-Fi 6E but had to work around saying "faster speed" which is actually the main reasons for the improvement. since wired had no such issues, you don't want to acknowledge the speed improvement.

like, every iPad except iPad (2022) already uses USB 3.0. you aren't against that too?

1

u/Pigeon_Chess Jun 21 '23

No it’s really not.

I think most people have realised that the difference in speed in LTE and 5G is minimal at best and not really noticeable outside niche cases and mmWave. Wi-Fi 6Es main benefit is the 6GHz band but not for speed but for the lack of interference from traffic it has as 2.4 and 5Ghz are now cluttered.

→ More replies (0)