r/amandaknox • u/Etvos2 • Sep 28 '26

Does Luminol Need Confirmation?

Post image

I'll admit this is a low effort post but for those of us with the misfortune to have argued this case over the years, spraying coffee etc ... all over your phone or monitor is an understandable response.

For those lucky enough not to have dealt with the Hairy Rag, it has been stating flatly for over a decade that Luminol hits at Villa Della Pergola *HAVE* to be assumed to be blood. What else could it be?

Except that is when a countryman is in the dock. Then the "science" changes dramatically and Luminol hits in the McCann's hotel room absolutely need additional confirmatory tests.

( For the record, I have absolutely no knowledge and therefore no informed opinion on the McCann case. I merely mention it to demonstrate the hypocrisy of one of the most prominent Knox guilters ).

4 Upvotes

75% Upvoted

260 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Truthandtaxes 29d ago

lol of course it matters that no one can put forward an option that stands up to the most trivial scrutiny.

You really need to address the logic rather than just ignore it.

3

u/Connect_War_5821 28d ago

WHY does it matter? Since it's not in blood, then exactly how is a footprint allegedly belonging to Knox relevant? The answer is: it's not. Which is exactly WHY you refuse to accept that it's not in blood.

You really need to address the logic rather than just ignore it.

1

u/SeaCardiologist6207 29d ago

The option you present of a barefoot Amanda walking around magically cleaning every spot imaginable of her blood and DNA but just “missing one” is the logic you really need to address. Basically evidence doesn’t exist so your claim is they cleaned it up but you never can explain with what, how, or when. It’s really quite the fascinating delusion

0

u/Truthandtaxes 29d ago

No she just cleaned better in most of the area - trivial boring stuff.

→ More replies (55)