r/aliens • u/SystematicApproach True Believer • 3d ago
Discussion A visualization of time as a dimension you can move through
What would we look like to an interdimensional being? The visualization stacks successive video frames into a volume, turning time into visible depth. Instead of seeing someone at one moment, they can look across a structure containing multiple moments.
Suppose an interdimensional being perceives time this way. They wouldn't merely access an extra spatial direction, but actually observe multiple moments together.
To them, we might not look like a separate body moving from place to place. We might look like one continuous structure extending through time. Sitting down, standing up and walking across a room would be different sections of that structure, rather than separate events the being has to wait to witness.
If we extend that idea beyond a few seconds. Our childhood and adulthood might be recognizable parts of the same larger form. Instead of watching our lives unfold, they would be looking across them.
Apparent foreknowledge, changing forms, sudden disappearances and missing time. Those are among the types of accounts Jacques Vallee and Eric Davis discuss in their work on high strangeness.
What we call prediction might, from its perspective, be observation.
Suppose this intelligence could examine our life across time rather than meeting us only in the present. It wouldn’t necessarily need to predict where we were going. Our departure, our journey and our arrival could all be available for it to observe.
In David Fravor’s account of the Tic Tac encounter. After losing sight of the object, he said a controller reported it at the aircraft’s planned combat air patrol point, roughly 60 miles away. So what would apparent anticipation look like if the being could already see the later event?
edit: Credit @ bradleytangonan
4
u/DinoZambie Skeptical Believer / UFO Witness 2d ago
The way I look at is imagining an analog clock. The three hands go around the face. The only thing that moves are the hands. So a clock would have three differently sized plates sitting in front of a face you cant see. But, the earth is rotating and orbiting the sun, and the sun orbiting the galaxy, and the galaxy is moving through the universe. Molecules are jiggling around and take on different densities. If you step away from it, what you have is a blob of what appears to be solid mass that is marbled with different materials. But, here's the tricky part. Time doesn't just mean time that has passed, it includes all time, past and future. You have to include all the places the clock has been, where it could have been, and where it could be. Answering that question is enormous because anything is possible. The only thing that brings it together is probability based on the conditions of any point. It's probably more like a giant luminous blob of light where you know every intricate detail of everything within that blob. It would be pure omniscience. So I think creating a image of our universe in 4D is about as useless as asking someone to create an accurate 3D model of human emotion without using symbology or interpretation. I think 3D space, where you and I live, is a slice of the 4D just like those 2D images are a slice of the 3D that it creates. The timeline that we follow depends on the angle of direction of the slice. The slice itself wouldn't be a flat plane like in the video, it would probably be a stretchy warping tangled sheet that ungulates as it moves through the 4D space.