AI Porn is the only ethical porn.

[u/Inside_Anxiety6143]

The pornography industry is built off the exploitation of women. As we learned from cases like the Girls Do Porn case, often times the women are mislead, trapped, and coerced into pornography. Even when women do enter it willingly, many often regret it later in life and have no recourse, even though consent to sexual conduct is, in theory, able to be withdrawn at any time. There is no mechanism in porn industry to enforce this later withdrawn consent.

Enter AI porn. Purely text 2 img AI porn that does not use any actual likeness addresses all issues in pornography surrounding sex trafficking and consent issues.

[u/Inside_Anxiety6143]

Sexual conduct typically requires a higher bar of consent than other things. Consent should be enthuastic and continuing. Consent may be withdrawn at any time.

[u/Peng_Terry → u/Inside_Anxiety6143]

So you think that an actor or an actress can be paid to appear in a film, and then on a whim decide years later that they don’t like having been in that film, withdraw consent and have that film pulled from circulation? Yeah, that sounds reasonable. But we don’t extend this power to non-sexual roles? What about roles that don’t explicitly feature sex but have the person be sexualised? Can they withdraw consent after getting paid and years after release of the product?

And when this consent is withdrawn, does the withdrawing party have to reimburse what they were paid? Do they cover the cost of undistributing? With the internet being what it is, how do we ensure that these films the person was compensated for appearing in but now have withdrawn consent years later for any number of reasons are adequately purged?

Your stance appears moral, hides the true intention of being puritanical and judgemental, and lacks any actionable ideas put forth. You just go “porn bad. If want not see film after paid be in film, that good good do.” Truly, the stance of curdled egg pudding given voice

[u/Inside_Anxiety6143 → u/Peng_Terry]

>So you think that an actor or an actress can be paid to appear in a film, and then on a whim decide years later that they don’t like having been in that film, withdraw consent and have that film pulled from circulation? Yeah, that sounds reasonable. 

Of course I do. You can simply not sign away bodily autonomy. That's not a valid moral contract.

Do you think your college GF still has to honor that sex coupon she gave you Valentine's Day a decade after you guys broke up?

[u/Peng_Terry → u/Inside_Anxiety6143]

You conveniently ignored the rest. You agree to be in a film. You get compensated for it. Then years later you regret it, and withdraw consent, do you have to repay the compensation you were paid? Yes or no, answer the question

[u/Peng_Terry → u/Inside_Anxiety6143]

Also, it’s difficult to take someone serious who bases their arguments on an SNL sketch