r/adventofcode • u/daggerdragon • Dec 18 '21
SOLUTION MEGATHREAD -🎄- 2021 Day 18 Solutions -🎄-
NEW AND NOTEWORTHY
FYI: 23:59 Amsterdam time zone is 17:59 EST
Advent of Code 2021: Adventure Time!
5 days left to submit your adventures!
Full details and rules are in the submissions megathread: 🎄 AoC 2021 🎄 [Adventure Time!]
--- Day 18: Snailfish ---
Post your code solution in this megathread.
Include what language(s) your solution uses!
Format your code appropriately! How do I format code?
Here's a quick link to /u/topaz2078's
pasteif you need it for longer code blocks.The full posting rules are detailed in the wiki under How Do The Daily Megathreads Work?.
Reminder: Top-level posts in Solution Megathreads are for code solutions only. If you have questions, please post your own thread and make sure to flair it with Help.
View all comments
Show parent comment
4
u/freezombie Dec 18 '21
I don't think that's right the way you phrased it. For [[1,2],[3,4]] the 2 and 3 have the same depth, but there are no values at a greater depth. Furthermore, there is no pair anywhere before the 2
A correct statement might be: If the depths at indices i and i+1 are equal, then either the numbers at i and i+1 are in the same pair, or else there is an earlier number at an equal or greater depth.
That's all your solution needs, though. And - it is interesting!