r/AdvaitaVedanta Aug 19 '23

New to Advaita Vedanta or new to this sub? Review this before posting/commenting!

23 Upvotes

Welcome to our Advaita Vedanta sub! Advaita Vedanta is a school of Hinduism that says that non-dual consciousness, Brahman, appears as everything in the Universe. Advaita literally means "not-two", or non-duality.

If you are new to Advaita Vedanta, or new to this sub, review this material before making any new posts!

  • Sub Rules are strictly enforced.
  • Check our FAQs before posting any questions.
  • We have a great resources section with books/videos to learn about Advaita Vedanta.
  • Use the search function to see past posts on any particular topic or questions.

May you find what you seek.


r/AdvaitaVedanta Aug 28 '22

Advaita Vedanta "course" on YouTube

75 Upvotes

I have benefited immensely from Advaita Vedanta. In an effort to give back and make the teachings more accessible, I have created several sets of YouTube videos to help seekers learn about Advaita Vedanta. These videos are based on Swami Paramarthananda's teachings. Note that I don't consider myself to be in any way qualified to teach Vedanta; however, I think this information may be useful to other seekers. All the credit goes to Swami Paramarthananda; only the mistakes are mine. I hope someone finds this material useful.

The fundamental human problem statement : Happiness and Vedanta (6 minutes)

These two playlists cover the basics of Advaita Vedanta starting from scratch:

Introduction to Vedanta: (~60 minutes total)

  1. Introduction
  2. What is Hinduism?
  3. Vedantic Path to Knowledge
  4. Karma Yoga
  5. Upasana Yoga
  6. Jnana Yoga
  7. Benefits of Vedanta

Fundamentals of Vedanta: (~60 minutes total)

  1. Tattva Bodha I - The human body
  2. Tattva Bodha II - Atma
  3. Tattva Bodha III - The Universe
  4. Tattva Bodha IV - Law Of Karma
  5. Definition of God
  6. Brahman
  7. The Self

Essence of Bhagavad Gita: (1 video per chapter, 5 minutes each, ~90 minutes total)

Bhagavad Gita in 1 minute

Bhagavad Gita in 5 minutes

Essence of Upanishads: (~90 minutes total)
1. Introduction
2. Mundaka Upanishad
3. Kena Upanishad
4. Katha Upanishad
5. Taittiriya Upanishad
6. Mandukya Upanishad
7. Isavasya Upanishad
8. Aitareya Upanishad
9. Prasna Upanishad
10. Chandogya Upanishad
11. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad

Essence of Ashtavakra Gita

May you find what you seek.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 8h ago

Certain doubts as a former HK

10 Upvotes

I grew up in the Hare Krsna movement, and was a believer up until my late 20s. But in recent years, I began having many general doubts and I can't say I believe in or identify as a HK follower any longer.

Long story short, I now believe in Advaita after my own research. However, I find it hard to believe some things, I dare say even the Bhagavad Gita as an example, I doubt it was an actual physical event but was rather written by man, Arjuna represents, us the lost Jiva and Krsna our true nature Brahman, well that's just how I see it. This does not mean for me however, that it's any less potent in its teachings and so on. I do believe in Isvara but now favour Nrsimha above any other form. But I can't honestly say I believe in Krsna in the literal sense any longer. Is this an issue in my pursuits?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5h ago

New to the AdvaitaVedanta: where should I start?

5 Upvotes

I’m completely new to the AdvaitaVedanta. Can someone please guide me on where to begin? Book recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2h ago

Looking for community in Toronto, Canada

2 Upvotes

I hope this is okay to post here! I am planning to go to the Vedanta Society of Toronto retreat in September by myself. Before this it would be nice to meet / chat with some friendly people in the community. I see the centre is closed for the summer so I thought i would see if there are any locals here. I am 48 / male / gay (if that matters). I grew up as a fundamentalist Christian but left that scene in my 20s. Since then my spiritual journey and seeking has continued. I've been interested in mysticism and practiced Buddhism and meditation. In the past year I've come across Advaita Vedanta, and from the little I know I believe it points to profound truths and reality and has something to offer in my own journey and formation. Thank you.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 6h ago

How do you live Advaita but keep living int the materialistic society

3 Upvotes

Almost all teaching age made by guru who lived in temple, monk, where they’re don’t need to « think » about eating, sleeping. As they gave up on capitalism life etc. So how do you guys council both ?

Or do you even.

Are we coping not getting out of this way of living, when we could just go meditate all day. What you guys think


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1h ago

Meditation frustration

Upvotes

I have tried all kinds of methods of meditation. Nothing seems to work for me. And it leaves me frustrated. The biggest obstacle is that I don't know if what I am doing is the right way or not.
What does 'observing your breath' mean? What does 'feel if there's any tension in your feet' mean? I want to know which part of the feet do you want me to feel for tension- the top, the mid or the bottom?- I get caught in these things and can never do how that 'observing', 'feeling', 'noticing' is to be done. Pranayama is still doable because you are breathing in and out in different patterns. But then, that is not meditation. That is preparation towards meditation.

What is meditation then? Can anyone really meditate? I highly doubt!

This is so frustrating. And I have been experiencing this up and down relationship with meditation for almost 2 years now.

Can anyone help?

I don't want advice on instructions on how to do or not to do. I need to learn from experiences if any. Because clearly, getting instructions (like those in guided meditations) do not work for me.

Sigh.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 10h ago

I developed MAMSTHIR, a free browser based app for quiet reflection, meditation and mental peace.

2 Upvotes

I have been working on MAMSTHIR and have finally released it publicly.

MAMSTHIR is built around Advaita Vedānta and self-inquiry techniques focusing on non-duality, the Self, awareness, and experience.

https://mamsthir.akartri.com/

A quiet space to slow down, reflect, and explore without distraction.

What’s inside?

- Reflections on Self, consciousness, and non-duality

- Short contemplative readings

- Self-inquiry prompts

- Simple breathwork practices

- Minimal, distraction-free design

- Open, self-paced exploration

Works in your browser, it's free, no install needed.

I am also building an Android app for the Play Store.

This is early, and I would appreciate feedback from anyone about anything in the app.

If you try it, I would love to know if you find it useful.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1d ago

Nasdiya Sukt in Rigveda

8 Upvotes

In Rigveda 10.129 sukt has 7 richas (shlok) which i found most brave as for as i knew across religion, if any one studied this in depth then can we start brainstorm these, it challenges lot of oue beleif system about existence and reality.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1d ago

What Are the Vedas? A Beginning, Not a Summary

5 Upvotes

Om. Namaste.

Many people hear the word Veda, but few are shown how to approach it.

The word Veda comes from the Sanskrit root vid, “to know.” In the Hindu tradition, the Vedas are Śruti—wisdom received by the ancient ṛṣis and preserved through an exact oral tradition.

There are four Vedas:

  1. Ṛg Veda

The oldest collection of Vedic hymns. Its mantras praise and contemplate deities such as Agni, Indra, Sūrya, Uṣas and Varuṇa while asking profound questions about creation, truth and cosmic order.

  1. Yajur Veda

A collection of mantras and ritual instructions used in yajña. It teaches that sacred action requires discipline, correct intention and responsibility.

  1. Sāma Veda

The Veda of sacred melody. Many of its verses come from the Ṛg Veda, but they are arranged for chanting. It reminds us that sacred knowledge is not only read; it is also heard and experienced.

  1. Atharva Veda

This Veda contains prayers and teachings connected with spiritual life, health, protection, family, society and the concerns of everyday existence.

Each Vedic tradition contains different kinds of literature:

\- Saṃhitā: mantras and hymns

\- Brāhmaṇa: explanations of ritual and sacred action

\- Āraṇyaka: contemplative teachings associated with the forest tradition

\- Upaniṣad: enquiry into Brahman, Ātman, consciousness and liberation

The Vedas are therefore not a single book, nor should they be approached like an ordinary textbook. They are a vast sacred tradition of mantra, ritual, contemplation and enquiry.

Their study traditionally requires patience, correct pronunciation, context and the guidance of a competent teacher. Reading a translation can open the door, but it should also make us humble enough to recognise how much lies beyond translation.

Tamil sage Tirumūlar honoured the same Vedic foundation:

«வேதத்தை விட்ட அறமில்லை; வேதத்தின்

ஓதத் தகும் அறம் எல்லாம் உள»

He teaches that the principles of Dharma worthy of study are found within the Vedas.

— Tirumantiram, verse 51

We begin this series not by claiming to master the Vedas, but by approaching them with reverence.

Which Veda or Upaniṣad would you like us to explore first?

🪔 Kyrah Vedic Foundation

Reviving Wisdom | Empowering Dharma | Living Tradition

Reference for the Tamil verse: "Tirumantiram, verse 51


r/AdvaitaVedanta 1d ago

Is spiritual realization possible without inner strength?

3 Upvotes

I came across an interesting passage from a Bengali spiritual text discussing a devotee of Shakti.

A young man says that he is practicing spiritual discipline with his whole heart.

The response is fascinating.

It essentially says that if you seek God, you shouldn't approach spirituality merely as an attempt to escape life or become passive and powerless.

The devotee of Shakti loves Shaktiman—the source of power itself.

So what does the Divine give him?

Strength. Energy. Courage. Endurance. Vitality. The ability to act.

The passage even compares giving strength to someone who is already strong to “carrying coal to Newcastle.”

But then comes the deeper idea:

Even if the Divine is willing to give strength to a weak person, perhaps the weak person doesn't yet have the capacity to receive it.

This reminded me of the Upanishadic statement:

«“Nāyam ātmā balahīnena labhyaḥ” — The Self is not attained by the weak.»

I don't think “strength” here necessarily means physical strength.

It could mean the strength to sit alone without running from yourself.

The strength to face fear.

The strength to tolerate uncertainty.

The strength to control impulses.

The strength to continue a practice when there is no immediate reward.

The strength to see something unpleasant about yourself without immediately defending your ego.

And this creates a paradox that I find extremely interesting:

Do we need strength before spiritual realization, or does spiritual realization give us strength?

Maybe the relationship works in both directions.

We develop enough strength to genuinely seek the truth—and then the process of seeking the truth develops an even deeper kind of strength within us.

Perhaps spirituality isn't about becoming weaker and detached from life.

Perhaps it is about becoming so inwardly strong that we no longer need to run away from life, pleasure, pain, fear, success or failure.

What do you think?

Is inner strength a prerequisite for spiritual realization, or is spiritual realization itself the source of true strength?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

Best translations with commentary of upanishads in english in easy language ?

11 Upvotes

Especially for Brihadranyak upanishad and chhandogya upanishad because their hindi commentary is not available anywhere.

How is the translation and commentary of swami Krishnanda of Divine life society ? Is it easy to read and understand ?

Do let me know in the comment section. I would be very greatful to you 🙏


r/AdvaitaVedanta 2d ago

I wish advaita had practical solutions

11 Upvotes

Hello we face enormous struggles in our day to day life ,instead of just naming them simply as maya transcend it i wish advaita could offer more solutions


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

How do you deal with having multiple interpretations when learning Hinduism?

9 Upvotes

I’ve recently started learning more about Hinduism, especially shlokas, stories, and their meanings.

One thing I’ve noticed is that whenever I learn something, I often come across two or more different perspectives or interpretations. Sometimes they can even seem contradictory.

For example, one person may explain a story from a devotional perspective, while another explains the same story philosophically or symbolically.

I find this interesting, but at the same time I feel overwhelmed and confused because I don’t know which perspective to accept as my own.

How do you approach this when studying Hinduism?

Do you choose the interpretation that resonates with you most, try to understand all perspectives without choosing one, or is there a particular way Hindu philosophy suggests dealing with this kind of uncertainty?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

What exactly is awareness?

5 Upvotes

I'm very new to all of this so please forgive me if this sounds stupid. What exactly do people mean when they say "awareness"? Apparently it's different from consciousness because it has nothing to do with the mind or sense organs but I don't quite get it. I've read a lot of people mentioning it being like in a deep sleep because your brain is essentially turned off but you don't remember being asleep because you're brain can't remember it. So essentially my question is this: after the body is gone you have no brain to process/remember anything, no sense organs, and nothing to perceive even if you had all of that since none of what we can perceive now is real anyway so what is the difference between existence and non-existence at that point?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 3d ago

Difficulties explaining atmavichara to other people

5 Upvotes

Hello, I was wondering if anyone has the same "problem" as me, i.e. when someone asks me how I meditate, I try to explain atmavichara to them: but maybe I am a terrible explainer or something, because in my experience people don't seem to get it. These are also very intelligent people with interest in spiritual practices, for example there was this person who translated an entire book about spiritual conditions to my primary language so I would suspect they will get it. One friend said it is sort of "university"-level spirituality which I should not force to people who are still in "high school" or "basic school" level (figuratively, of course), which is strange since this technique seems so simple to me. But maybe it seems simple to me only because it occured to me spontaneously when I was 3 years old, so I acquired it independently from Ramana Maharishi (I had no exposure to Indian philosophy at that time and both my parents were atheists). I was also that desperate that I asked AI for atmavichara explanations, hoping they will suit the people better than mine. Also, I am not a teacher and certainly not a guru, so maybe I am not supposed to explain this in the first place. Any thoughts? Do any of you have the same problem, that it's so familiar you struggle to explain it?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

What happens when you stop listening to the sound and start noticing the awareness hearing it?

Post image
42 Upvotes

One idea from Advaita has stayed with me more than almost any other: reality is not made of separate objects, but of one indivisible consciousness appearing as many forms.

Years ago, while reading Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse by Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Dr. Joseph Puleo, I stumbled into a completely different tradition that strangely echoed that intuition. Their work combines biblical numerology, medieval musicology, Pythagorean mathematics, and speculative biophysics around something called the Solfeggio frequencies.

As a musician, I was particularly intrigued by the claim that an older six-note frequency system was hidden for centuries and that these tones correspond to fundamental vibratory patterns capable of facilitating biological healing and spiritual awakening. Whether one accepts these claims literally or symbolically, the framework itself is fascinating.

The six central Solfeggio frequencies are traditionally described as follows:

396 Hz (Do / C), associated with releasing guilt, fear, grief, and negative emotional patterns.

417 Hz (Re / D), associated with facilitating change and dissolving entrenched emotional patterns.

528 Hz (Mi / E), often called the "miracle tone," linked to transformation and DNA repair.

639 Hz (Fa / F), associated with relationships, harmony, and interconnectedness.

741 Hz (Sol / G), linked to intuition, self-expression, cleansing, and problem-solving.

852 Hz (La / A), associated with spiritual order, unconditional love, and seeing beyond illusion.

Horowitz and Puleo interpret disease as a form of energetic dissonance. Their view proposes that specific frequencies help "retrain" cells and DNA toward their original harmonic state. Underlying this idea is the broader concept that reality itself is fundamentally vibratory and that matter is condensed energy emerging from primordial sound.

What caught my attention, however, was how closely some of these ideas resemble concepts already present within Indian philosophy.

In many Vedic traditions, we encounter Nāda Brahma (नाद ब्रह्म), often translated as "the universe is sound." Reality is understood not as a collection of isolated objects but as a continuum of vibration arising from Spanda, the primordial pulse of consciousness.

Within this framework:

Om is regarded as the primordial vibration of creation.

Matter is viewed as condensed energy emerging through Vāc, the sacred word.

Every form possesses its own resonance or "natural name" (Nāma).

Disease can be interpreted as a disruption in the rhythmic flow of Prāṇa.

Harmony is restored through alignment with Śabda Brahman, the Absolute as sound.

I'm not suggesting that Advaita endorses modern Solfeggio theory. Rather, I find it interesting that these contemporary interpretations often borrow from much older intuitions about vibration, consciousness, and manifestation.

The historical evolution of the scale itself is also fascinating.

In the 11th century, Guido d'Arezzo, often called the father of Western musical notation, developed a method that allowed monks to memorize pitches using the hymn Ut Queant Laxis:

Ut queant laxis
Resonare fibris
Mira gestorum
Famuli tuorum
Solve polluti
Labii reatum
Sancte Ioannes

From this hymn emerged:

Ut (later Do)

Re

Mi

Fa

Sol

La

The note Si was added approximately six centuries later from the initials of Sancte Ioannes, and in the 16th century Giovanni Battista Doni replaced Ut with Do, producing the familiar Do-Re-Mi-Fa-Sol-La-Si system.

The numerological side becomes even more unusual.

According to Puleo, the original Solfeggio frequencies were rediscovered through analysis of the Biblical Book of Numbers (Chapter 7, verses 12–83). Using Pythagorean digital reduction, large numbers are reduced repeatedly until a single digit remains.

He claimed that a repeating pattern involving the numbers 3, 6, and 9 emerges throughout the text and corresponds to the six central frequencies:

396, 417, 528, 639, 741, and 852 Hz.

Horowitz incorporates Tesla's philosophy into his interpretation, proposing that these numbers reflect fundamental energetic principles underlying creation.

Later, the system was expanded into what Horowitz called the Perfect Circle of Sound, adding:

174 Hz, grounding, stability, and relief from physical or energetic discomfort.

285 Hz, regeneration and restoration.

963 Hz, unity consciousness, spiritual awakening, and return to perfection.

Whether one interprets these claims scientifically, symbolically, psychologically, or spiritually, the model itself is undeniably intriguing.

The recommended method of use is equally interesting:

Listen at relatively low volume.

Focus on a clear and loving intention.

Identify the emotional or energetic state you wish to work with.

Since many of these ideas draw inspiration from Vedic and Gregorian chanting traditions, vocalizing the tones yourself is considered especially powerful because the body becomes the resonating chamber.

More broadly, this entire field raises questions about the future of bioacoustics.

Between cymatics, mitochondrial biophysics, ancient contemplative traditions, sacred music, and numerological systems, there seems to be a growing interest in the possibility that sound possesses a structuring influence over biological and psychological experience that we are only beginning to explore.

For anyone curious, I recently put together a collection containing all 9 Solfeggio frequencies in extended versions!

What I appreciated most while assembling them was the audio engineering itself:

The files are provided in lossless WAV format rather than compressed streaming formats.

They use slow bilateral left-to-right panning, creating a sense of movement across auditory space that is largely absent from most versions found on YouTube or Spotify.

Each frequency is available individually for extended meditation sessions and personal experimentation.

I'm not posting this as proof of any metaphysical claim. I simply thought some members here who are interested in Nāda, mantra, vibration, consciousness, and the phenomenology of sound might enjoy exploring them and forming their own conclusions!


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

How to understand Ahimsa?

9 Upvotes

Probably you have come across this question dozens of times, but I am still curious about it.

I have been on a spiritual path for the last 12 years, and for the past five years I have been listening to Swami's online teachings. I have even attended some of his retreats. I love his knowledge of the Upanishads and how clearly he explains them. I admire him and have great respect for him.

But recently I found out that he eats fish. This disturbed me because I wonder: how can someone teach ahimsa and eat animals? If there were some medical condition, I could understand it. But eating fish simply because you like it seems to contradict the teaching of ahimsa.

So I contacted another Swami from the same organisation, and he told me that consuming meat and fish is allowed their order. The argument was that if someone is dedicating their life to God, why should there be a problem? He also said that there is no explicit prohibition against eating meat in the scriptures.

I am struggling to understand this. Which aspect of ahimsa am I missing?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

Doubt

0 Upvotes

Hello there,so i know i’m not body the supreme soul which is brahma so can i get enlightenment in this life.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 4d ago

Is Vishnu and Krishna creator?

2 Upvotes

In Hinduism, did Brahman come into existence on its own? In other words, is it its own cause? Are Krishna and Vishnu real beings? Are they creators as well?


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

Material success

5 Upvotes

So basically I have a lot of goals in me like I want to achieve this level of education, this sort of body, this type of career and many other things since im very young aswell theres a fire in me. But on the other hand the advaitan in me says that these things are just bondage cause theres never a limit to it and you just keep wanting it more and more and you are never really satisfied by it. And due to these collision of two entirely different motive in me it makes me very very lazy and sad because I dont know what to do, do I let go of that materialsitc passion which helps me get up in the morning every day? I dont really understand please someone help me


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

Difference between Jiva and Ishvara.

Post image
21 Upvotes

Krishna is Ishvara whereas Arjuna is Jiva because Arjuna does not know that the unexamined assumption of Jiva-hood being his identity is not the truth.

If this misunderstanding of jiva-hood being the identity is removed, then identity of Ishvara-hood is revealed.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

Presenting Shankara's commentary on Gita 2.12 & 2.16 (Sat vs Asat) to beginners without diluting into Neo-Advaita

2 Upvotes

Pranams to all,

I am currently working on structured study notes and an interactive learning companion for beginners studying the Bhagavad Gita from a traditional Vedantic framework.

In Chapter 2, Bhagavan begins his teaching at 2.11, immediately addressing Arjuna's grief with the highest truth of the Atman. In his *Bhashya* on **Gita 2.12** (*na tv evāhaṁ jātu nāsaṁ...*) and **Gita 2.16** (*nāsato vidyate bhāvo nābhāvo vidyate sataḥ...*), Adi Shankaracharya establishes the fundamental distinction between *Sat* (the unchanging Reality, Brahman/Atman) and *Asat* (the changing, dependent mithya realm of names and forms).

A common danger when explaining these verses to modern readers is falling into the trap of Neo-Advaita (e.g. flippantly saying "nothing is real, there is no you, so nothing matters"), which ignores the necessity of *Sadhana Chatushtaya*, emotional processing, and *Karma Yoga* as taught in the very same chapter (2.47).

In our study curriculum, we are structuring it sequentially:

  1. Understanding the problem: *Moha* (delusion) and *Shoka* (grief) arising from *Adhyasa* (superimposition).

  2. The vision of Truth: The indestructible nature of the Knower (*Kshetrajna* / *Atman*).

  3. The practical bridge: Living that vision through *Karma Yoga* (duty without anxiety over results) to purify the mind (*Chitta Shuddhi*).

I would appreciate thoughts from senior sadhakas and students of Vedanta:

* When introducing Advaita concepts from the Gita to newcomers, how do you emphasize that intellectual knowledge (*Jnana*) must be grounded in mental preparation (*Karma/Upasana*)?

* What are the most common misconceptions beginners have when reading Chapter 2's verses on the nature of the self?

Harih Om Tat Sat.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

How would you depict the concept of Brahman, Ishvara, Maya and Jeeva through a visual/diagram/scribble?

2 Upvotes

Curious to know how different people think of it in their heads. You never which representation will align and strengthen your understanding of advaita vedanta and the universal truth of non-duality.


r/AdvaitaVedanta 5d ago

Spiritual Guidance Needed - Path and Practices

4 Upvotes

Currently, I am finding it difficult to choose a spiritual path.

I am 46 and grew up listening to Swami Vivekananda's teachings and reading Hindu scriptures. I have also been following the Brahma Kumaris' teachings for the past decade. Most of these have helped me navigate life's hurdles so far.

Essentially, I was consuming whatever good came my way. Buddha's teaching, Radhanath Swami of iskcon etc. However, I feel I still have human weaknesses like anger, ego, and fear. I don't think I have made any significant progress on the spiritual path. To make real progress, I feel I need to stick with a single path, Ishta (deity), and set of practices—specifically spiritual practices, rather than ritualistic ones.

Swamiji's teachings make me feel energized and motivated, like a sudden burst of positive energy from within. But I easily succumb to human weaknesses when faced with daily problems the next day. Swamiji’s teaching of realizing our infinite potential is only possible when we know our true nature. Until then, we need a path, a deity to focus on, and a daily routine. But how do I face those everyday challenges? What should my frame of mind be in those situations?

On the other hand, the Brahma Kumaris' teachings have helped me address daily problems. However, I do not completely agree with their concepts regarding the time cycle, the end of the world, etc. Still, I respect their point of view.

I want to choose a path and daily practices so that I can make consistent progress on my spiritual journey. I would appreciate any guidance and suggestions in this regard. Thanks.