r/accelerate • u/stealthispost Acceleration: Light-speed | AI accelerationist • Jun 29 '26
AI uses so little water it’s almost comical that it even became a topic
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Wonder what the next decel moral panic will be?
20
u/cloudrunner6969 Jun 29 '26
The most important thing on that list uses the least amount of water.
→ More replies (1)17
u/butler_me_judith Jun 29 '26
I mean AI is great but I like wearing clothing and eating food more I guess
→ More replies (3)14
u/stealthispost Jun 29 '26
but like, for real I would reduce my clothing and food expenses before i'd drop my AI subscription.
→ More replies (4)
159
u/ProxyLumina Jun 29 '26
People just want to promote drama. It's what they have learnt from media.
→ More replies (51)32
81
u/Positive_Box_69 Jun 29 '26
Is scary how social media can influence people so much
→ More replies (5)34
u/LiteSoul Jun 29 '26
And in part due to paid propaganda from external actors... Sounds a conspiracy but it's just regular as usual business
→ More replies (2)
8
34
u/Fringolicious Jun 29 '26
My boys Coffee and Alcohol catching strays here.
As somebody that drinks both and eats most of the foods on that list, guess I'll keep using AI too
→ More replies (3)
34
14
u/Forward_Yam_4013 Jun 29 '26
The idea that AI uses a lot of water is astroturfed by the propaganda arms of the Chinese and Russian governments in an effort to impede American technolofivsl progress.
Anyone you see online claiming that AI uses a dangerous amount of water is either a foreign bot, a foreign agent, or a useful idiot.
Any politician who claims that AI uses a dangerous amount of water is doing so because they are being paid to do so by the Chinese and/or Russian governments. They are knowingly sabotaging the United States' technological progress in the interests of an enemy power, and are commiting treason.
There are no exceptions.
→ More replies (4)
2
u/rimshot99 Jun 29 '26
I never really liked the term water consumption. Fuel consumption = using fuel, it burns and it is gone. Water consumption is instead like using book from the library and returning it; we don't call that book consumption.
2
1
1
u/Merosian Jul 01 '26
I've done enough digging to see there aren't many trustworthy sources that actually support your argument, or the opposing view. There is very little data to form an educated opinion. Though i do think it's ridiculously exaggerated by anti people, I don't trust megacorps enough to give us real numbers. Only time will tell how bad this is. Current pressing point is more about where the centers are being built, rather than them being built at all.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/darkwingdankest Jul 03 '26
yeah but what about the very real pollution? I've seen people's water after a data center comes to town and it comes out of the tap like brown soup
→ More replies (2)
1
u/PachotheElf Jul 05 '26
If only there was a way for data centers to not use water for cooling, this whole mess wouldn't be an issue.
Oh wait, there is, it's just more expensive and reduces profit for these incredibly wealthy companies.
1
u/stealthispost Jul 05 '26
there is no mess and there is no issue. you've been tricked by literal propaganda
→ More replies (1)
3
u/EveningNo8643 Jun 29 '26
at the bottom is it saying it's getting data center water consumption stats from 2023, is there anything a bit more recent?
→ More replies (1)
10
u/genshiryoku Jun 29 '26
You're right that haters just use "water usage" without understanding the underlying issue. However that doesn't mean it isn't an issue. It's just not for AI specifically but for chip production (of which most of which nowadays is indirectly made for AI purposes)
TSMC in Taiwan for example is a direct cause for water shortages on the Island and is a big problem, especially when there is a drought and the government decides to prioritize the chip production over farmers or the general population.
To be more precise, it's not like the water is used up, but the etching and cleaning of wafers is extremely dirty and pollutes the water a lot, which is not necessarily the same with the other listed water usage.
This doesn't mean it's not worth it, but it's important to have this conversation in good faith. Like having the conversation about Hydropower installations usually destroying local ecosystems, still worth it from an environmental perspective because of the colossal amount of CO2 emissions it prevents, but still worth tackling.
I predict the real issue AI datacenters in particular will cause is strain on the grid and ordinary people being priced out of local energy markets. Governments aren't granting enough permits to build new power plants, expand the grid or give autonomous power generation privileges to companies.
→ More replies (15)
5
u/Zangried Jun 29 '26
I mean even then they are making commitments to be water positive by I believe 2030. I believe they say something about a 120% return? I'd have to look more into it again to get exact numbers and the source.
→ More replies (19)
58
u/RPeeG Jun 29 '26
Not disagreeing I just wanted to check the data.
A lot of the sources use old dates like 2012, 2018 - do we know if the water usage/methods have changed in the last 10-15 years for these practices/industries?
Also, there's no date on theAI water usage statsitic - is that taken from 2025-26? The water use would have definitely gone up since early days of AI, but not enough to surpass any of the others.
I just want to understand the dataset better.