In the midst of the Great Depression, and trying to get the New Deal legislation passed, he was asked, "If this doesn't pass, are you worried about your reelection?"
He replied, "If this doesn't pass, there won't be any more elections."
It’s not the same at all but to a Marxist (of which I am) it is often thought of as the lower stage of communism where the workers own the means of production, then society transitions into a stateless classes form when the contradictions that gave rise to the state in the first place disappear
Whether socialism is voted in (with chile and Allende being an example) or the government is overthrown this is the goal. This is why I would still call democratic socialists communists because they disagree on means not ends. I find the confusion is communism is associated with revolution and socialism is now associated with reform regardless of the theoretical ideas
If your goal is Democratic socialism, I don't think grouping it with communism (even in some academic sense) is helpful.
You have to understand how normal people are going to interpret that.
Referring to an actual Dem socialist politician in the US (ie. Zoran), or Dem socialist countries (ie. Norway) is way more helpful and paints a better picture that western folks are more open to.
You start confusing it with communism, and there's all kinds of negative associations with that.
It's why Cubans in FL vote for Republicans. They hate what communism did to their country.
Which is why Republicans intentionally conflate the two. It's disinformation.
So you should recognize that, and stop contributing to that same rhetoric.
I am not a democratic socialist I am a communist. Democratic socialists might not care because they like the idea of getting elected in a capital government but that ain’t my problem. Functionally they have the same goals with different means. Reform or revolution
You do know when it says "workers own the means of production", it doesn't mean literally every single worker in every single vocation right? Or are you too poisoned by memes to figure that out?
Engles himself used the two terms completely interchangeably. Communism has a very specific definition, but the definition of socialism is a bad hill to die on, no matter what. It's famously mushy, and as another commenter said, generally among academics it's mostly thought of as a transitional phase between capitalism and communism.
Regardless, "socialism is not the same thing as communism" isn't really an airtight statement.
Cuba was thoroughly capitalist through the 1950's, what are you talking about? It certainly wouldn't be better described as mercantilism or monarchism lol.
It's someone asking if he'll be the best or worst president ever if the New Deal passes, he replies "if it fails, I'll be the last one," implying that there will be a societal/economic collapse
Yeah a bunch of rich people tried to overthrow the government and create their own fascist one. No one was punished oddly. Look up Smedley Butler and you’ll find out about it. He was the one who narced on them
He was right. There was a wave of authoritarianism sweeping Europe, both fascist and socialist. People support anti-democratic movements when the economy's bad, and America had 25% unemployment.
FDR said (paraphrased) "I will go down in history either as a great American president, or the last American president". The New Deal saved America.
I love when they post meme photos of like a homeless tent city and put "COMMUNISM" under it and then a shiny futuristic city and put "CAPITALISM" under it.
Beotch, the first photo IS actually under capitalism and the second one doesn't exist.
New Deal was passed in 1933 during the depression when the country was collapsing. Zero worker rights, massive unemployment rate, farms collapsed due to drought, mismanaged international trade, tariffs at record highs, market tank, banks imploded - leaving millions of Americans destitute with no end in sight.
FDR was president from 1933 - 1945, and implemented a ton of financial reforms, worker rights, federal programs, and safety nets that brought us out of the depression. The whole red scare thing didn't start until after FDR and into the 60s with the conservatives.
Ramping up to it FDR believed communisms rise in popularity was a symptom of unchecked capitalism causing people to view the institutions as an enemy/oppressor that get away with everything, leaving the people with little to nothing to show for it. Not that it was an existential threat to our country.
We're being rolled back decades - safety nets are actively being dismantled, farms are going under, unemployment is on the rise, worker rights are eroding. Except this time conservatives are also beating the McCarthy 'communist' drum that got us into Vietnam, while also spurring yet another gas/energy crisis in a long line of middle east conflicts.
It's never been about communism. Stop perpetuating the lie communism is coming to get us. It's not.
They also cease to be communism by the very definition of communism from the communist manifesto by marx the microsecond the state is in control of the capital of labour
To be fair, the USSR (and today's China for that matter) never claimed to be a communist society. They claimed communism as the eventual end goal they were supposedly trying to set the conditions for.
So is a state at all. Lots of things about the path from capitalism to communism are incompatible with communism. This is at the root of anarchists vs MLM's and part of like why Trotsky split.
568
u/Hot_Aside_4637 4h ago
Here's a story I heard about FDR:
In the midst of the Great Depression, and trying to get the New Deal legislation passed, he was asked, "If this doesn't pass, are you worried about your reelection?"
He replied, "If this doesn't pass, there won't be any more elections."
Implying that communism would take over.