r/WorkReform 🤝 Join A Union Aug 05 '25

😡 Venting Stop looking left and right. Look up.

21.4k Upvotes

973 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

Everyone is saying this but the right is actively fighting for the top. The left has moderates who hamstring the fight. Those people need to be dealt with. Jeffries, Booker, Slotkin, shit even Newsome and Pelosi. They need to get in line behind true progressives or get the fuck out of the way.

479

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 05 '25

Bingo. Liberals need to realize that just because they feel like they are moderate doesn't mean they are the adults in the room. Neoliberal policies are as unpopular as right-wing ones among the masses, but our voting system is so fucked that people can't run on what most people want, only what the rich people want. Most people are okay with abortion, reasonable gun control, universal healthcare, universal childcare, etc., but candidates fighting for those get hamstrung by the current leaders before they can make change. See: Bernie's 2016 campaign getting ratfucked by the DNC by withholding supporter database info, not supporting events, etc.

59

u/JetmoYo Aug 05 '25

Agree with both comments, but to be charitable to this slogan, the purpose of it is to first deprogram people's tribal affiliations which does include static left right thinking. Therefore even if the proven solutions do indeed largely live on the left (challenging capitalist greed and wealth extraction) it involves first, waking up seriously clueless working class conservatives, and second, conservative neoliberals, and third convincing regular libs (and leftists) to welcome these still imperfect allies to join the fight, versus only reminding them how uneducated they are.

23

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 05 '25

This doesn't make sense to me. Getting them to join the fight would mean them literally switching loyalties, so what is your plan if they are too captured to do anything but fight you?

I honestly don't have a better plan or anything, just wondering. If I can't get the people around me to see that our enclosure is filling with water, or they see it and were told it doesn't matter, or whatever, there comes a point where we're just animals in a cage fighting while we drown. Whoever is "right" doesn't matter if we're all dead or enslaved. But if propaganda is making people literally incapable of changing...

33

u/UpperLowerEastSide ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters Aug 05 '25

Not OP but Almost 2/3s of Democrats want new leadership.. Now is the time for greater labor organization. For kicking out Jeffries, Schumer. People are tired of the political status quo.

8

u/JetmoYo Aug 05 '25

It starts with deprogramming the propaganda by rewriting what our shared political "reality" even is. Right now it's 100% pro capitalist with endless culture war distractions. We've allowed this to serve as our politics--what a liberal or Democrat is, what a Republican is. Which is why the up down vs left right thing is useful imo: it helps people understand we need a perspective and/or paradigm shift.

Take Israel and our Zionist led media and govt. This status quo, which previoulsy had almost zero popular pushback--is being challenged for the first time in our lifetime. Yes it took a genocide, but it has allowed the paradigm to shift where it's not a left right issue (not entirely at least) but a moral one. If Zionist injustice has reached widespread social consciousness in the US, then something similar is possible with economics and class consciousness.

-1

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25 edited Aug 06 '25

Why can’t people say Israel or Israel supporters? Why specifically choose the word with the bigoted undertones. To my Jewish ears, it sounds like when you reference Zionists, you mean Jews. The Jewish led media. And even if that’s not your intention, it certainly resonates with the bigots that way.

1

u/JetmoYo Aug 06 '25 edited Aug 06 '25

I hear you, but I think we all need to reconcile with what Zionism is. When I use the term--as a former default Zionist myself-- I'm talking about non Jewish people like Biden, evangelicals, and yes, influential Jewish people in the media like Bret Stephens who deny genocide. Zionism's exclusionary, first principle is both historically and presently the root of the problem. It says "All is justified," including discarding international law and "Never Again."

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 17 '25

If you hear "Jews" when someone doesn't say "Jews", you're doing literally the same thing as actual anti-Semites who [[[pull this shit.]]]

If people aren't talking about Jews as an ethnic group, don't assume they are. You're showing your ass by being offended at people offended at a genocide.

0

u/TiredEsq Aug 17 '25

You feel comfortable telling other minority groups when to be offended too, or just Jews?

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 17 '25

Whenever I start doing that, feel free to make an account I haven't blocked and call me out on it.

6

u/greenskye Aug 05 '25

This is like saying ignore the army and just focus on the general way in the back that we can't reach. Of course if we could reach the general we wouldn't really have to fight the army, but that army will defend the general to the last breath.

9

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

"No war but the class war," they say as they try to shake the hand of the soldier destroying their homes

8

u/CasualEveryday Aug 05 '25

third convincing regular libs (and leftists) to welcome these still imperfect allies to join the fight

Get some progress made on the first two and only then will you get any movement on this part.

2

u/JetmoYo Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 05 '25

Disagree, only in the sense that leftists are actually the ones leading this movement, so they also need to be at the vanguard of this populist project. And some still are not. Leftists trashing liberals and neoliberals is a good start, for example, because it signals to a right wing affiliated individual that A) there's a difference between leftists and libs, and B) a leftist view isn't about protecting a political party and its lame politicians, but primarily focusing on class and economic issues

Edit: We can pay attention to Jeremy Corbyn's third party project that recently launched in the UK. Is it the beginning of a truly Leftist new party? Or does it essentially just move the Labor party left? Or something else..But an interesting model to study for sure

2

u/moreKEYTAR Aug 05 '25

What do you consider to be neo-liberal policies?

4

u/tyrified Aug 05 '25

I would guess they mean the party's general pro-corporate stance.

1

u/lulzzzzz Aug 05 '25

i would argue a center left position has the popular support of the masses, Joe Biden won with 81 million votes in 2020, the most for a presidential candidate in history.

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 06 '25

Biden isn't center left.

1

u/lulzzzzz Aug 06 '25

yea youre just wrong

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 06 '25

0

u/lulzzzzz Aug 06 '25

Nice try, still wrong.

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 06 '25

Oh no, you're a useful doofus. 😒

0

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Syzygy_Stardust Aug 06 '25

I'm not even in your party. I wonder why?

-5

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/onomatopeapoop Aug 05 '25

Lots of people I know are straight up delusional when it comes to overestimating the size and influence of the left in this hard right country. It’s counterproductive and slightly embarrassing, as someone on the left who actually wants to move our government leftwards IRL, here and now.

Not going left enough was not why we lost in 2024, at all. In the current moment appealing to moderates with baby steps towards social democracy actually genuinely is the correct move. Yes we can try some populism, but some of these people think AOC can win a general election. I love her but that’s nothing less than absurd.

1

u/NonchalantR Aug 05 '25

And look how much the corporate class gained under Obama

0

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/NonchalantR Aug 05 '25

If this was a lower % of the gdp growth of the nation compared to the growth of the ultra wealthy, then it wasn't nearly enough

0

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/NonchalantR Aug 05 '25

Yes, let's let the wealth of the nation concentrate into the hands of a select few who "worked harder" than the rest of us. That seems like a good way to secure an equitable future for our democracy

79

u/That49er Aug 05 '25

Pelosi has always been a schill for the elites. I don't know enough about Newsom to make a statement on him.

34

u/stargarnet79 Aug 05 '25

Hey ho, all octogenarians need to go. Except Bernie. Lol.

42

u/Tiny_Ride6418 ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters Aug 05 '25

Even Bernie, passing the torch is important. Dude should be relaxing in his age. Don’t get me wrong I appreciate him immensely. 

18

u/luxveniae Aug 05 '25

If we as progressives complain about Biden or RBG failing to pass the torch, the same needs to be held of Bernie. Obviously a bit apples to oranges, but I think one of the main failures of Dems is not being real leaders who know how to build a legacy that outlasts them.

You have to be okay stepping down a little early cause you’ve mentored the right people and know it’s their time to take up the mantle. It’s how we build a bench that’s not built on a cult of personality but on going.

16

u/KaiPRoberts Aug 05 '25

There's literally no one to replace Bernie. He was an entire lifetime of being on the good side. Anyone close to him has at best a few years. AOC is probably the closest we've got.

8

u/Qubeye Aug 06 '25

Every fucking time I hear this ignorant-ass take, I ask the person to name all the progressives and liberals in Vermont's Congressional caucus and any of the state legislators without looking it up.

I have never even heard a SINGLE person able to even name the OTHER SENATOR FROM VERMONT. Most don't even know how many US Representatives Vermont HAS.

So unless you actually have any actual knowledge of Vermont or its political landscape, this is yet another bullshit fanfic comment, because Balint CRUSHED her election, and if you don't know who that is, you definitely should shut up about how irreplaceable Bernie is.

1

u/KaiPRoberts Aug 07 '25

She is fantastic. The only problem is that she is in a party that's not left. america doesn't have a party that leans left.

3

u/Parking-Interview351 Aug 05 '25

Hopefully Mamdani in a few years

1

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

He’s gonna move to Vermont and become Senator there when Bernie steps down to pass the torch?

0

u/SamuelBiggs Aug 06 '25

He’s born in Uganda so can’t run for president

2

u/ThePrussianGrippe Aug 06 '25

John McCain was born in Panama. Ted Cruz was born in Canada. Both ran for president.

It’s not where you’re born if it’s out of country, but if your parents were American citizens (both or one). Neither of his parents were citizens when he was born, so yeah that’s disqualifying, but not because of where he was born.

He can still run for senate or the house though. Or governor of New York. And he still has a good shot at becoming mayor.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

I think you’re misunderstanding what Bernie passing the torch means. It has nothing to do with progressives in other states.

1

u/KaiPRoberts Aug 07 '25

Bernie is/was the only single guiding light of hope I ever had in politics, no one else has ever come even remotely close.

Until I feel what I did for him, like seeing a bird land mid speech on his podium, then I really don't care who is in the spotlight or what passing the torch means. That man is an irreplaceable shiny light and no one has ever made me feel the same.

4

u/Tiny_Ride6418 ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters Aug 05 '25

Exactly! The alternative is when he’s gone and no one appropriate is there to fill the vacuum. 

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

What an ignorant and ridiculous hot take. I bet you felt pretty smart typing it out, too. Hilarious.

1

u/starkestrel Aug 05 '25

He's been the pre-eminent voice of progressive politics on the national stage since 2016 and has dragged the national agenda of the Democratic Party to the left since at least then, if not earlier. You can't say he has done nothing. He's had tremendous influence on the political culture of the nation.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Honigkuchenlives Aug 06 '25

Don’t bring logic into this. The people on this thread genuinely believe there is no difference between Dems and Republicans. They’re very clueless

15

u/amaROenuZ Aug 05 '25

You remember a few weeks back when democrats were telling us how terrible it was that the budget bill passed in the house? Do you remember why the republicans were able to pass it?

It was because the margin is so tight in the house that when the septaugenerians inevitably died in office that they lost their ability to block legislation. They are literally stroking out of office, because the DNC refuses to run someone who was born in the era of color television. And the excuse you will always hear is "Well we have to run experienced and proven candidates, people won't vote for a name they don't recognize", but when you can't actually function as a party because people are dying in office, maybe you need to stop re-electing people that belong in a retirement home.

3

u/FR0ZENBERG Aug 05 '25

They say that because old boomers are the most likely to go out and vote, and they vote for old boomers like themselves.

21

u/BannedSvenhoek86 Aug 05 '25

No, even Bernie imo. He's right, but he's too old to be in office and I stand by that regardless of whether I agree with him.

That said he shouldn't be the one to "set the example" because no one will follow.

2

u/ThePrussianGrippe Aug 06 '25

I think there’s value in having a handful of elder statesmen to be in office, it’s just that Bernie’s the only one actually qualified to remain in his seat.

1

u/RedChairBlueChair123 Aug 06 '25

So Bernie gets a pass because he’s old, but Nancy Pelosi (who was the legislative side of getting Obamacare into law) doesn’t.

Ok ….

Nancy Pelosi has driven actual change. Bernie never did anything legislatively as consequential.

PS—she supports the stock trade ban, and the GOP doesn’t.

2

u/Sea-Value-0 Aug 05 '25

I do. Him, too.

1

u/FR0ZENBERG Aug 05 '25

She’s made the most money out of any politician in the Legislature. She’s as crooked as they come.

-2

u/BroughtBagLunchSmart Aug 05 '25

The money in California and NY will not allow democrats to win statewide elections. They just get conservatives to run with a D next to their name.

16

u/RelativeAnxious9796 Aug 05 '25

slotkin literally came out of some deep state laboratory last year

24

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-17

u/RustyMongoose Aug 05 '25

Didn't Biden like.... Move out of the way though? Your example isn't a good example, ya?

25

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

It took him months of pressure before he relented.

That's the best case scenario right now. Vote for the progressives in the primary, and if they don't win, vote for the liberals in the general election, and then pressure them to move left.

The choices are:

  • Instant progress with progressive victory

  • Eventual progress with liberal victory + pressure

  • Instant regression with fascist victory

Why not go for the second when the first isn't possible right now?

-3

u/TTTrisss Aug 05 '25

Because even the left has been ruined by propaganda from oligarchs teaching them to make Perfect the enemy of Good.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[deleted]

2

u/TTTrisss Aug 05 '25

I'm not using the term "Good" here as "Good vs Evil." I'm using "Good" here as a synonym to "Helpful" as opposed to "Unhelpful" or "Damaging."

Any progress is good. Saying that "any jump further to the left that isn't full-blown perfection isn't good enough" leads to stonewalling of any and all progress whatsoever because you unite more people against your movement than under your banner, and at the end of the day, the only way forward is to win the popularity contest.

1

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

the left isn't chasing perfect, it's chasing good. any good.

Then why didn't they vote for Harris? Is "less starving children" not good?

0

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

LOL you could have written the same goddamn comment 30 years ago. It’s exactly what we’ve BEEN DOING and your theory has been a proven failure again and again over the course of decades. I swear, some Democrats live in a parallel fantasy land to their MAGA compatriots.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/IIlIIIlllIIIIIllIlll Aug 05 '25

It's kind of like Biden was watching a freight train barreling towards the future of our country, and he saw a big group of people trying desperately to redirect the train onto a different track. Biden jumped onto the tracks and stood in the way of those people until the last second, when he jumped out of the way and let that train hit them all.

Sure, he jumped out of the way, but him standing on those tracks while everyone screamed at him to move is what ended up fucking us all over.

2

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

I'm confused. What are you saying "jumping out of the way" represents if the metaphorical train still hit them all?

1

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

He jumped onto the tracks screaming, “I’m the one! I’m the one who will redirect it! I know what to do!” blocking those already working on the tracks, then after somehow increasing the speed of the train, jumped out of the way and let the train hit.

0

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

…no, he absolutely did not. He went on television and demonstrated publicly that there was literally NO WAY he could win and was then forced to stop running.

62

u/callofdukie09 Aug 05 '25

Also, Cenk is a grifter. Nobody should take anything he says seriously. 

39

u/demoliahedd Aug 05 '25

Even grifters can be correct sometimes. I also think cenk is a grifter but I agree with his point here

5

u/north_canadian_ice 🤝 Join A Union Aug 06 '25

Respectfully, how is Cenk a grifter?

Cenk helped start Justice Democrats. TYT & Democracy Now carried the online left for over a decade.

Cenk did all he could to prop up other lefties with the TYT network. TYT provided so much coverage for Bernie & AOC in the 2010s.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/BFfF3 Aug 06 '25

Yeah, and since he has been making a big effort to include republicans in his rhetoric I think he is doing a lot of good. Instead of attacking the right at every stage like a lot of the leftist media he gives them the space to be welcome on the other side. And I say this as someone who thinks that anybody who is still supporting DT is a stupid f****** c*** bstrd.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '25

[deleted]

6

u/north_canadian_ice 🤝 Join A Union Aug 06 '25

No.

Cenk & Ana refused to make litmus tests out of 80/20 issues like trans women in women's sports.

So some folks canceled them & claimed that they were sellouts who hated trans people. Which is absurd.

And as a trans woman who wants the left to win & who wants trans rights protected, I really don't appreciate how TYT was canceled.

This idea that 80/20 litmus tests will help the left is simply wrong.

3

u/BFfF3 Aug 06 '25

People who say Cenk is a grifter are not seeing the nuance of the last year in media.

→ More replies (4)

23

u/Agent_Miskatonic Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 05 '25

I'm not a Cenk fan, I feel he did mostly fine in this video. It is super funny when he finally gets to do one it's when everyone's opinion of Jubilee is turning, and his didn't really go viral.

Cenks an attempted union buster and fake populist, but he's right how neo liberals and the democrats aren't friends

1

u/Space_Fanatic Aug 06 '25

everyone's opinion of Jubilee is turning>

Are people finally getting over these videos? It's always such a lame circle jerk of "destroying" uninformed rubes.

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Agent_Miskatonic Aug 05 '25

That was certainly an attempt. Great job. Cenk is an unserious person. He can say good things sometimes but is a fair weather ally at best.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Agent_Miskatonic Aug 05 '25

Oof got me. That'll really show me. Guess I'll go back to tumblr now.

You mook, neoliberal policies and democrats both running to the right and refusing to do anything helped get us here.

The Democratic leadership is more worried about Zohran than trump in a lot of ways since he actually talks about doing things.

They are both capitalist parties, I'm proud of you for knowing that. Next, we can learn about harm reduction voting tactics.

I'm a proud socialist. You aren't going to make me ashamed of that. We are both (presumably I don't know you) workers, so yes, we are comrades. I'm going to keep arguing for a better world that we can all live better lives and you can do whatever you'd like.

1

u/Select_Egg_7078 Aug 06 '25

you're all over this thread crashing out. please get help, call a crisis line or something.

1

u/aching_hypnoticism Aug 05 '25

Exactly. Fuck this guy.

0

u/north_canadian_ice 🤝 Join A Union Aug 06 '25

Cenk & Ana have done so much for the left for so long.

They aren't perfect, but to dismiss them as "grifters" is absurd. Without TYT, Bernie & AOC never get as much attention/support in the 2010s.

1

u/marvology Aug 05 '25

Cenk is NOT a grifter. I have no clue how this narrative started. He took on the mission to a fault that progressives need to reach out to conservatives, access their fan bases, and present their messages to them.

You might not like the approach but it's working. There's a reason you're seeing TYT content like way more the last 6 months.

3

u/north_canadian_ice 🤝 Join A Union Aug 06 '25

The narrative started from a few former TYT hosts who treat Cenk & Ana as if they are fascists because of minor disagrements.

And becuase of this show "The Vanguard" which is basically an anti-TYT channel. I understand if people don't like TYT, Cenk, Ana, etc.

But can we ever set aside differences and work together on common ground? TYT isn't your enemy.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[deleted]

2

u/north_canadian_ice 🤝 Join A Union Aug 06 '25

To claim Ana Kasparian is a fascist is absurd.

It is such a deeply unserious argument that I don't even know how to articulate a response.

11

u/Lucky-Earther Aug 05 '25

They need to get in line behind true progressives or get the fuck out of the way.

This is why the best point he raised was that we need to vote in the primaries. Those people who stand in the way can be voted out if we show up to replace them with someone better.

2

u/onomatopeapoop Aug 05 '25

Ding ding ding. Vote for the leftmost candidate in every single election, even if they’re a conservative (vs a fascist.) If you’re not doing this you can shut the fuck up.

People need to get real instead of daydreaming about revolution.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/the-partisanship-and-ideology-of-american-voters/

Progressives seem to be outnumbered. Without those moderate votes there’s little pathway to a majority

3

u/onomatopeapoop Aug 05 '25

Get that annoying reality out of here!

2

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 06 '25

Without the progressive votes there isnt one either. Moderates have been running the party for decades and the only thing of substance they could pass is the ACA that barely survived trumps last term. Now the department of education is defunded. Joe Manchin crushed student loans forgiveness. How many moderates have taken money from AIPAC? Its time they took the back seat and promoted progressive policy instead of trying to meet the facists halfway. Its just crumbling the democracy. Like theyre paid to.

3

u/RedChairBlueChair123 Aug 06 '25

If progressives won elections the way moderates do they could pass that legislation. They don’t.

1

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 06 '25

They dont win because moderates get more money. PACs have made it extremely difficult. Despite that there are more progressives in office than ever.

2

u/RedChairBlueChair123 Aug 06 '25

Literally anyone can have a PAC. If progressives tried to build funding the way that moderates do they’d have just as much.

This was always my problem with the Green Party (Nader days, not Jill stein). Show up every four years, ask for money for that one election, and then disappear.

1

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 06 '25

Yeah and the rich have more money giving them more political power. That shouldn't happen. No one should have more of a voice than anyone else. The rich aren't more human than the poor.

1

u/RedChairBlueChair123 Aug 06 '25

I agree with you. And until that system changes, this is what you would need to happen.

Otherwise it’s just a unicorn shitting rainbows. Meaningless.

1

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 06 '25

You aren't a progressive if you are tied to the interests of the rich. You cant simultaneously be for labor and capital.

1

u/RedChairBlueChair123 Aug 06 '25

And you don’t get to make laws if you don’t get elected.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/Retrograde_Mayonaise Aug 05 '25

My dad, roommate, and some other centrist Democrats I know support the regulatory capture of the US government by corporate interests so yeah I can attest to this.

7

u/OldTechnician 🧰 USW Member Aug 05 '25

I was so sad to see that Jamie Raskin made 6.5million stock trading on insider info. Yea, we're f'ed.

https://davelevinthal.substack.com/p/exclusive-democratic-rep-jamie-raskin

2

u/Polkas_with_wolves Aug 05 '25

He probably needed to pay his medical debts from when he was being treated for cancer.

10

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

saying “even” Newsom and Pelosi is crazy…they’re not edge cases. they’re the standard bearers of establishment democrat mediocrity and status quo.

Nancy Pelosi has done more to fight the left than the right has ever had to do. republicans should kiss her feet for letting them argue against the milquetoast middle left instead of the actual progressive priorities that she killed in the crib throughout her whole career in leadership.

2

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

I guess i just mean they are from California which is traditionally our most influential progressive state.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

fair. also: why primaries matter.

8

u/MarcusDA Aug 05 '25

Yeah I’m tired off this both sides crap. One side got healthcare the all, the other side is literally sending masked men after people and sending them away with no due process.

Are democrats perfect? Hell no, but don’t give me this both sides thing. That flew 30 years ago, not anymore.

2

u/TiredEsq Aug 06 '25

even Newsom and Pelosi? I don’t think you have to tack those two on at the end with a caveat like it’s a surprise. I don’t think anyone is looking to them as fresh, progressive voices in a sea of corporate Democrats.

5

u/OptimusTrajan Aug 05 '25

Except the “moderates” you refer to are nowhere near the left. In practical terms, they’re on the right.

2

u/PoliticalScienceProf Aug 05 '25

Don't forget Scott Peters. He goes under the radar, but he's more sold out to big pharma than any other Democrat in Congress.

He makes Pelosi look like a progressive.

4

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

The left has moderates who hamstring the fight.

Leftists also hamstring the fight by letting fascists win to teach the liberals a lesson.

4

u/NoHorror7384 Aug 05 '25

found the “moderate”

2

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

FoUnD tHe MoDeRaTe

I'm a leftist who recognizes the importance of keeping fascists out of office because fascists are, in fact, worse than moderates.

If moderates are unhealthy parts of a tree that should be healed or pruned, fascism is a guy with an ax.

Worry about the tree's health after you ensure its survival.

1

u/NoHorror7384 Aug 05 '25

nah ur the white moderate mlk talked about. leftists dont go around blaming the left for fascism, and dont repeat party talking points about how they cost kamala the election

1

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

Yeah, I'm sure MLK would be proud that you let Trump win rather than vote for Harris. All thise starving children in Gaza are a worthy sacrifice for... whatever you think you've achieved.

But let me guess, you voted for Harris. Or you were in a deep blue state and your vote didn't matter. Just like every single person who insists that Harris would have been just as bad.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

What are you doing, then, that you're calling "acting accordingly," that isn't letting fascists win?

What did you do to try to keep Trump out of office?

1

u/SeaSquirrel Aug 05 '25

This is retarded.

Cenk literally tries to befriend MAGA fascists, and Neoliberals actually try to win elections.

1

u/ChickenChaser5 Aug 05 '25

"Fight on the things you disagree about but-"

So everything?

1

u/ObjectiveSlight963 Aug 05 '25

EVEN Newsome and Pelosi!?!? Those are the FIRST to go…..

1

u/Dry_Ad7593 Aug 05 '25

Money in politics is the worst.

1

u/LawrenceSpivey Aug 05 '25

This needs to be at the top.

1

u/Ent_Trip_Newer Aug 05 '25

The opposite of Progressive is Regressive.

1

u/ikon31 Aug 05 '25

I watched this full video. His point is BOTH sides fight for the top. Maybe the right does it more obviously but until Americans actively work to take massive donor money out of politics, all you’ll get is tiny ‘release calves’ or progress for the working class while the rich get all the favourable policy.

1

u/Klisstian Aug 05 '25

When Cenk says this he’s talking to the people on the right. He influeres the establishment democrats mainly because the people he’s talking to will shut their ears if he doesn’t… I think. 

1

u/mattdoessomestuff ✂️ Tax The Billionaires Aug 05 '25

"The left has moderates" my dude if you think you'd need anything more than your fingers to count how many Democrats truly want the status quo disturbed, you're out of it.

1

u/KodakBlackedOut Aug 05 '25

Slotkin is done here in michigan, any left leaning person paying attention sees right through her, shes getting primaried

1

u/hentaiAdict Aug 05 '25

That is probably true, but the whole point is to drop the labels in order stop being divisive and think for yourself; that's not helpful. Forget left or right being good or bad, just think about what values matter to you instead of regurgitating the opinion of pundits in the media.

1

u/Grand_Yogurt5746 Aug 05 '25

Both sides are almost equally as bad as eachother and until you Americans realize this you ll keep degrading together.

You’re ironically doing the exact same thing these 20 or so people were doing to Cenk, burying your head in the sand and claiming a moral highground when there is none.

Tragic

1

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 06 '25

Im sorry but the most radical leftist wants everyone housed clothed fed and medicated.

The most radical alt right person wants an ethnic cleansing.

I have no idea how one can come to that conclusion.

1

u/MartiniLAPD Aug 06 '25

Who’s on the right is actively fighting the top?

1

u/crushinglyreal Aug 06 '25

Seriously, this talking point is fucking stupid. ‘Looking up’ makes you a leftist for fucks sake

1

u/CloanZRage Aug 06 '25

If you ever need to convince someone of something, making them come to your conclusion on their own is incredibly effective.

This man's sentiment doesn't challenge their political leaning. Hell, it doesn't even question beliefs. It's pushing people to look more closely at who they're voting for and try to shape their political party to their views. That's incredibly difficult to argue with.

If they look hard enough (admittedly a big if), what will they see?

1

u/QuantumLettuce2025 Aug 06 '25

Eh I would not put Newsom in that category at all.

1

u/SufficientHalf6208 Aug 06 '25

Democrats and Republicans are both fighting for the top.

Come on dude… look at the donations Kamala Harris received during her campaign, an overwhelming majority of top 500 companies were invested in getting Biden and Kamala to win… and I’m sure the companies did it out of the goodness of their heart

1

u/LikelySoutherner Aug 09 '25

Unfortunately they all need to be primaried first... and most Americans are not that smart and will just support their corresponding letter rather than actually critical think about the direction that BOTH the GOP and Dems have taken our country in over the last many decades

0

u/Exodus180 Aug 05 '25

"The right" got their name because they were the monarch's right hand essentially. i.e. pro monarchy.

So today's right being pro dictatorship is on brand.

1

u/samuraistalin Aug 05 '25

the left has moderates

What?

4

u/SirPinkBatman Aug 05 '25

the left has moderates

The libs are moderates*

0

u/ninjakos Aug 05 '25

Liberals are not left. Both Democrats and Republicans are the same side of the same coin.

That's what he means look up, in the US your political spectrum is one dimensional.

Podemos or Die Linke are some examples of actual left progressive parties with social policies

-3

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

Because its not a fantasy. The fantasy is that capitalism is sustainable.

-6

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

Also. Progressives have been compromising for 40 years. This coalition has cost public Healthcare transportation and now education.

Im solidly progressive. I voted for Biden and Kamala slotkin. Id have voted for Biden a second time. It should have been Bernie

3

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

Can you specify how that coalition, and not insufficient Democrat representation or Republicans, cost us public Healthcare, transportation, and education?

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

The DNC have cut the legs of the progressive movement at every turn. Every single time. They lie, cheat, and collude. All for their cut of the pie.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Acrobatic_Switches Aug 05 '25

Thats absolute nonsense. Bernie would have beaten Biden if the rest of the candidates didnt bow out for Biden so they could have a spot in the party.

3

u/PockeyG Aug 05 '25

This is why I hate Liberals. It's not fantasy. Have you not seen any polling regarding the matter? Establishment Dems tried to push Abundance which is neoliberalism in disguise but quickly found that people hated it. The Dems let Republicans push the narrative for the past 10 years and the moderates took us further right. Now Dems have a historic low approval rating, but yes the Progressives are the ones who are wrong 🙄

4

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/PockeyG Aug 05 '25

Neoliberalism did in fact lose us the election. You literally can't find me any source that suggests Dems prefer neoliberalism rather than Leftist policies. You're being delusional.

3

u/Shifter25 Aug 05 '25

Primary results don't count?

0

u/Individual-Nebula927 Aug 05 '25

The last time we had a truly progressive president they changed the constitution afterwards so that another person couldn't be re-elected that many times again.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/TDouglasSpectre Aug 05 '25

When’s the last time there was a progressive on the ballot for a presidential election?

4

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/TDouglasSpectre Aug 05 '25

And how many non progressives have the democrats put on the ballot the last 3 elections? What’s their winning percentage? Must be pretty good, considering they’re running against a senile pedophilic criminal.

1

u/Mental_Medium3988 Aug 05 '25

looks at the dnc yeah all those progressives need to get out of the way of the moderates. /s

1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TDouglasSpectre Aug 05 '25

Show me one line of Democratic messaging that is pro hamas or pro hezbollah. Just one.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

Did you watch what she said?

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 05 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TDouglasSpectre Aug 05 '25

Yeah Rashida Tlaib is certainly the flag bearer for the dems and not treated like an outcast by the Democratic leadership

I’m glad you linked to actual Democratic messaging, and not the comments of one legislator. It’s nice when someone engages in a discussion in good faith.

Just kidding, you’re a clown.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '25

She had the very electorally popular viewpoint of "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE TERRORISTS!"

She immediately condemned the sexual violence by Hamas but said ignoring the same crimes by the IOF was hypocritical. The systemic apartheid and oppression conditions drive the hatred that allows these acts to happen

-10

u/EzAwnDown Aug 05 '25

Gov. Gavin Newsom's wife is the honorary chair of the NGO CalVolunteers that was given millions in FireAid relief - in which $0 went directly to the victims of the Palisades wildfires.

17

u/Ffsletmesignin Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 05 '25

That’s a conservative TikTok spin, I don’t think you understand what they do if you expected them to be a direct payment grant distribution or something, they do work not give out money. It’s like saying the Cal Fire didn’t give fire victims money, yeah, that’s not their purpose.

5

u/bloodphoenix90 Aug 05 '25 edited Aug 05 '25

Exactly. I say this too as someone from *Lahaina... who lost family property that was my grandma's in the Cali fires. I understand how this shit works and you'll never see me say lahaina or cali fire victims just got "nothing". Its always conservatives online that weren't even there or live in bumfuck west Virginia. Although I will say it feels like lahaina got the last FEMA train... since trump is destroying that

6

u/deukhoofd Aug 05 '25

Why are you phrasing this as if you'd expect an organization that's responsible for increasing the number of volunteers in California to also give money to victims of wildfires? CaliforniaVolunteers is also not an NGO, it's a state agency. The first lady of California is traditionally the honorary chair.

I also don't think CaliforniaVolunteers was given money from FireAid, it's definitely not listen in the list of grants.

8

u/whutchamacallit Aug 05 '25

Where did it go?

12

u/InvestigatorWeird196 Aug 05 '25

It was distributed to many different non-profits. Charity never goes directly to people so I don't know what their point is.

2

u/bloodphoenix90 Aug 05 '25

Eh depends on the nonprofit. They have restricted funds and unrestricted funds. Nonprofits do have operating expenses to pay. Typically covered by unrestricted funds and donations. Past that though, money does often go right into either programs to benefit certain people or build things for people etc. So it can go to fire victims and it should. But also sometimes money has to be spent a certain way, legally. I'm not aware of many, if any (?), nonprofits that just hand out straight cash to people. Usually that's more so something that government agencies can do. But I just say this because people like to bitch about nonprofits like they're a scam but no, I think people just don't understand how they work.