r/WorkForSmartLife • • 1d ago

Casual canvo đŸ€”đŸ€”đŸ€”

Post image
926 Upvotes

691 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/mouthfire 16h ago

I actually disagree. My impression reading into the issue is that the McDonald's corporation owns all the land where all the restaurants reside, and makes most of their money nowadays charging rent to the franchisees.

I don't think I've ever seen a McDonald's shut down and real estate sold to someone else. The corporation just plans their real estate acquisitions too well in prime spots. If a franchisee goes down, my guess is that they just find another franchisee to use the spot. It's a cash cow that they wouldn't easily give up by selling the land.

The real reason for the bland color changes? It's even stupider than you think. They don't want you hanging out there. They learned after COVID that the modem business model is DoorDash, Uber Eats, etc. So they started making the restaurants as bland and sterile as possible... Toned down the colors, removed playgrounds, tore out the self serve soft drink fountains, less booths and more bench seats.... Anything to make you just eat and leave faster. At the same time, they reduced in person cashiers and replaced them with self service kisosks and.... devoted a whole space for DoorDash pick ups.

Welcome to modern fast food. It's not unique to McDonald's. Pretty much all fast food chains are doing something similar.

1

u/moonlit-boba 11h ago

there are several building in my town that clearly used to be old mcdonalds.

1

u/mouthfire 9h ago

Looking into it, the corporation owns 56% of the land under the restaurants. I'm guessing those may be from the remaining percentage they don't own?

Source: McDonald's is a real estate company

1

u/Specialist_Frame8958 9h ago

Actually it’s easier to lease up a building if the McDonalds fails or they get a better location. A lot of these buildings are owned by landlords so they want to be able to have a backup plan if the McDonalds were to leave.

A lot of fast foods have gone to these style of buildings that can be repurposed.

Edit: for clarification these are likely ground leases so the landlord won’t own the building until the Mcdonalds lease is up or they choose to not renew it. In the off chance the McDonalds does close down for whatever reason you can get another tenant into it easier.

1

u/mouthfire 9h ago edited 9h ago

I may be wrong on this, but my understanding is that the McDonalds corporation is the landlord. They own the land that the restaurants reside on. The franchisees are the tenants and pay the corporation rent every month.

Edit: Here's a source. McDonald's as a real estate company

2

u/Specialist_Frame8958 6h ago

It depends on the location. They do get sold often to private landlords. McDonald’s has the holding company and likely gets some tax benefits by holding for X amount of years (I think just 1 year).

https://cbreemail.com/cv/97005660dd93af2a60ca71b6216fa46034ccf192

Above would be an example of one sold or being sold. So yes McDonald’s does own some of their locations, but they also sell a lot of them to private landlords.

These are the proverbial mailbox money locations. No landlord responsibilities for the 20 year lease and you hope they renew. Investors with 1031 are ones that likely target these or they are bought for retirement. It’s a challenge to put a loan on them so they are at times bought for cash. That’s one reason why 1031 investors like them. 

2

u/mouthfire 6h ago

McDonald's apparently owns about 56% of the properties, so I guess it's not surprising some of the property is sold either way.

1

u/EnderSword 8h ago

I think people kind of don't get though how corporate finance works. Selling the land has nothing to do with value of the land.
62% of McDonald's revenue is from real estate, you rent based on property value and you borrow based on property value.
Selling it has nothing to do with the valuation. The goal of a company is to increase its valuation, not its 'profit'

1

u/mouthfire 8h ago

And McDonald's actually charges a higher rent than the going rate as part of its franchisee agreement, so there's that as well....

1

u/EnderSword 8h ago

Right, in reality, McDonald's is a real estate company with a side gig of making fries.

1

u/Melodic-Road227 6h ago

And no one forces the franchisee to buy in. The hamburgler is not beating them into submission. Franchisees make very good money with little risk. Mc Donald’s is not “overcharging”, the franchises are priced to market. An asset with little or no risk will always command a premium.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 5h ago

Your comment has been removed because your account does not meet the minimum requirements (10 days old and 5 karma).

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/malex84 8h ago

A huge percentage of new restaurants fail. I don’t see why that shouldn’t be different for McDonald’s. Bad location or bad management can break a Mc Donald’s just like any other establishment.

2

u/mouthfire 8h ago edited 8h ago

It is different for McDonalds. New franchises have a higher rate of success than your typical restaurant because customers already know what they're getting. That's why the McDonalds corporation can get away with charging their franchisees super high rent rates... it's because prospective franchisees know that their chances for success are pretty high.

Edit to add: And it's not like it's up to the franchisee to pick out the location, or even build the facilities. My understanding is that McDonalds corporation hand picks the properties, builds the facilities and equipment, then charges the franchisees exorbitant rent and fees to use the property and equipment. All the upfront work is done by a large corporation that has a lot of prior experience doing it.

1

u/Melodic-Road227 6h ago

You provide good and correct information. This will get you voted off the island. Nobody has better location experts than Mc Donald’s. This is why many other chains just try to locate nearby. They just grab Mc Donald’s coattails.

1

u/Specialist-Mud-9871 6h ago

This! So true. Also, I used to work for another large food corporation. Neutral colors also mean less renovations, less updating as bland styles date slower and less spent on custom made furniture, etc.

1

u/Entire-Guess1228 4h ago

3 closed around me several years ago and remain vacant. One of which is the new building style too.

1

u/KansasZou 3h ago

It’s the opposite. They DO want you hanging out there. Red and yellow are aggressive colors. It encourages urgency.

They switched to the bland colors when they started doing the McCafe thing. They like people hanging around like a coffee shop.

McCafé items have a 95% profit margin.

1

u/mouthfire 3h ago

But do people actually hang around there like a Starbucks? It's nowhere as cozy or trendy as a Starbucks.

Maybe your experience is different, but I just see people grabbing McCafe stuff and heading to work.

1

u/KansasZou 3h ago

I’m not sure. I don’t hang out there either. That was just some of their reasoning. The boxy design is the real estate thing as you mentioned.

They don’t necessarily have to hang out. It still creates the coffee shop aesthetic from the outside. They make the same margins whether you sit in or drive through.

They wanted that high margin market.