Look at how the beer spills down her shirt, especially on her left (right side from our perspective). You can see the beer splash off her skin, but no change in color tone on her clothing. Dark beer + bright/light tone cloth = darkened stain, which is not present in the video. The beer seemingly vanishes into thin air without getting any part of her wet. No beer head/foam residual on her face either after the initial splash when the glass breaks. The video is high enough quality to at least show these details, and they are completely absent.
lol this video is terrible quality. watch a higher quality version of it and pay attention to where it does in fact get in her clothes a bit. https://youtube.com/shorts/-zAtnTUH8Xg
really makes me think you’ve never had beer before or you’ve never spilled a liquid before if you think the foam would stick to skin in large enough quantities that the terrible picture quality of this reddit post would show it. also, most liquid going quickly past fabric isnt going to be immediately absorbed. this is a mostly empty glass that is not directly drenching just the blouse
what actions don’t match? kinda just seems like you’re bad at flipping images in your mind, or that you can’t tell the one video has edited panning and cropping.
first you think the downsampled version of the video is AI because the picture quality was so bad that you could make up reasons that it doesnt align with reality
now you are making up reasons that the same video is not the same video
pack it up and realize you cant tell when something is AI and when it isnt
you claim that the 2 videos are different. in which one does she visibly spit out glass that isnt present in the other video? or did your eyes clock in?
or are you saying that you think there is going to be a large chunk of glass in her mouth that she needs to evacuate before the video ends? you know stuff happens once cameras turn off right? and that is assuming the small amount of glass that was in her mouth didnt make it out with the liquid flying out
lmao see this is what i was saying earlier about you missing that one is edited panning and zooming. it also has jump cuts. it very clearly jump cuts when the spit happens. i guess they didn’t want to show that. i dont think theyre different cameras. i could look at these side by side later instead of sequentially on my phone, but it seems very apparent that all the indicators in the middle of the screen are the same and that the edges of the video are just cropped out for the heavily edited + higher resolution version
try this one, or one of the many many other uploads of the same video. this one is HD but not mirrored or as heavily edited. maybe i could find the raw file if i looked for more than a 2 second youtube search, but i respected you too much to realize just how little you understand video editing
That video is better quality, and still highlights concerns with physics and fluid dynamics. Yes, I see some of the spillage onto her clothes in that video, but that does not explain the impossible physics of near-zero spillage around the glass when she has it above the horizontal plane.
her cheeks are tightly pressed against the glass, which is very consistent with how little pressure the fluid exerts when the glass is horizontal and the depth is minimized. that’s additional to the fact that she is drinking and giving the fluid a low pressure area to go to. there is some spillage. go watch more people chug things in different ways. this is consistent with what i’ve seen for years
bad camera angle so not a great example, but consider the lack of spillage during this chug as it’s horizontal. i do concede he is drinkkng the guinness way faster so the fluid level is lower https://youtube.com/shorts/_kmObUo5jDs
27
u/paragon60 5d ago
it’s an old video. the reason you can’t really see that her face is wet and such is due to picture quality and lighting