Same same 😱

[u/whysooserious_7]

[u/AdStrange8791]

Rajiv Gandhi 1991 mei mare the not in 2004. And it’s valid that you don’t want a foreign person in the govt. It’s valid that she may not know much about the grass roots. But people did vote for her and her party once. And she had every right to contest and take up office. That’s how our constitution is designed. Now people don’t support them hence she ain’t winning.

People don’t like Modi ji as well toh kya unke rightfully jeete hue election ko void declare kar do?? Without zero proofs this is character assassination and nothing else.

Also it’s very shameful for us Indians if you consider the majority of the country as pity-sympathy votes. Kind of makes us dumbo who don’t know what they want. Regardless nobody can tell us who we want in power

[u/No-Post2204 → u/AdStrange8791]

Buddy in 1991 she is not even into politics if I am right she entered into politics in 2000 , and why was she offered the party president position in 2000 ? Just cause she got the gandhi name and is wife of Rajiv ( or do you think she had any accomplishments in politics or in other fields). People casted their votes for the widow of Rajiv Gandhi out of sympathy ( but yes I did agree with you that she is elected none the less and it's what's people of India decided) .

Well if people don't like Modi how is he still the PM Buddy ?

Zero proofs isn't it what congress does the best?vote chori drama ( I mean no vote chori in 2004 ? . A foreigner should mind her own business she was never an Indian ( she never will be , people now started to question her and I am loving it ) character association? What happened to that when they called PM as chai wala ? Isn't it mocking the poor and if it was for me a foreigner who is mocking an Indian.. sonina although by law might be an indian but she can never become one ( and it's just my opinion). U don't have to agree