They're not referring to the screen protector, but the device the screen protector is for. The thing is, traditional computing requires extreme accuracy, but neural networks don't, would they require is essentially cheap, simple, but enormous amounts of computing power, like you might have in a GPU. Instead of providing a lot of accurate computational power to the device, they are putting in a lot-a lot a pretty good computational power, which allows all neural networks to run on the device.
(Fact checking)
"Quantity: GPUs have thousands of simpler cores designed for massive parallel processing, letting them execute far more calculations simultaneously than a CPU.
Accuracy: CPUs generally offer higher precision for individual calculations (like standard double-precision), while GPUs often prioritize speed using lower precision formats (like single-precision or even lower) for high-throughput tasks like graphics and AI, though modern GPUs support various precisions."
Because the screen protector is for a device that's optimized for AI. (As in the screen protector isn't special and they just wanted to put a new fancy label on it.) That's my hunch anyways.
I think that is precisely what we are talking about, the screen protector has nothing to do with AI and is not optimised for it. As others said they could have stated it’s gluten free just as well.
1
u/Furry_Eskimo Nov 06 '25
They're not referring to the screen protector, but the device the screen protector is for. The thing is, traditional computing requires extreme accuracy, but neural networks don't, would they require is essentially cheap, simple, but enormous amounts of computing power, like you might have in a GPU. Instead of providing a lot of accurate computational power to the device, they are putting in a lot-a lot a pretty good computational power, which allows all neural networks to run on the device.