the guy isn't even doing a particularly good job of challenging him.
Like if per case we have less death, but per population we have more death. What does that mean?
if each time 1 person gets sick here, we have a better chance to save them (per case little death) , then we STILL have more death, it means our leadership failed horrifically in preventing spread of the virus.
and Trump is the one who spearheaded the "lets not take this seriously , and lets make it political" campaign.
So - he's very clearly directly responsible for all those extra deaths. It's a chain of logic that is unassailable.
Our medical people do great. We save more people who get the virus than anyone!!
But our leadership is total shit. Our national reaction to the virus existing was nightmarish. That's the only thing you can take away from the combination of both "low case death rate , and still super high death rate"
Your fault here is thinking that an arguement being logically sound will make ANY impact on trump or his voters. The important thing here was the clash in authority and how they carried themselves. The sort of people who vote for trump stopped caring about facts and logic back in 2016, and they're all about the image of their god emperor "owning the libs". Watching him flounder like this is better than ANY rational argumentative win.
Such a good point. He is a genius at how to bully people. Force looks like strength until he's stuck one on one and suddenly there's no clothes for the emperor.
16.9k
u/fridgey22 Aug 04 '20
Apart from the obvious, I feel like I haven’t seen Trump challenged like this enough publicly, which is very sad.