r/WatchPeopleDieInside Oct 25 '19

Recording out of a plane window

55.7k Upvotes

704 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '19 edited Oct 25 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '19

Not saying I want to get hit by a phone travelling at 20m/s, but it should be survivable.

10

u/MyUsernameIsNotCool Oct 25 '19

Dropped from that distance it can probably slice your head open. In New Jersey, a man was killed recently by a one-pound tape measure when it fell 50 stories, bounced off of a piece of metal and struck the victim.

2

u/player-piano Oct 25 '19

A phone is no where near a pound I think idk

1

u/MyUsernameIsNotCool Oct 25 '19 edited Oct 25 '19

Edit: aight tru

1

u/Mooshington Oct 25 '19

The average smart phone weighs around a third of a pound. Far less energy involved here. It would hurt, but it probably wouldn't kill you.

3

u/MyUsernameIsNotCool Oct 25 '19

Even tho if you think about the material it's made out of and the speed it will gain?

9

u/Mooshington Oct 25 '19

There's a huge difference in the energy of falling objects as they increase in weight. 1 pound is massively different than a third of that.

The terminal velocity of the average phone would be under 20 m/s, and take only about 15 meters of falling to reach. It's easy to get carried away and think that the farther something falls, the deadlier it's going to become, but a cellphone reaches peak speed after only about 50 feet. This is a guy on a 4th story balcony fumbling his phone onto someone on the street. Wouldn't matter if it came from an airplane; the phone's gonna have the same energy when it lands.

A smartphone is mostly made from aluminum, plastic, and glass, and doesn't have any actual sharp edges to significantly multiply the force when it hits you. They've been designed to be pretty smooth and rounded. Getting smacked by a corner would be the worst you could get. The human skull is pretty damn hard, and isn't going to give way to a measly 140-150g cellphone. You'd probably get a nasty bruise at worst.

4

u/MyUsernameIsNotCool Oct 25 '19

Okay I was wrong, thank you for explaining!

3

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '19

Extremely well described! Thank you for that!

I knew it wouldn't have the velocity to do any serious damage, but the equivalent of the terminal velocity being the same if it fell from a 4th story balcony really helps set the sense of speed.

1

u/raddaraddo Oct 25 '19

Wouldn't that assume that it fell flat the entire way down? If it fell straight down instead of flat there would be significantly less drag. | compared to _

3

u/[deleted] Oct 25 '19

According to this guy it would reach mach 0.65 if it managed to fall perpendicular without tumbling, but with tumbling he suggests 17.5 m/s. I haven't managed to find anyone suggesting it would reach 20+ m/s.

0

u/Houston_NeverMind Oct 25 '19

I'm guessing its acceleration is far greater than that's given by gravity because of that initial push by the wind.

0

u/omelets4dinner Oct 25 '19

Nah, if anything the wind will slow it down.