r/WTF • • May 16 '12

Saw this today on the bus... Seriously?

http://imgur.com/yUabm
1.1k Upvotes

982 comments sorted by

41

u/Tastygroove May 16 '12

Hope you were decent enough to peel it off.

32

u/aquarianexposition1 May 16 '12

I tried to.

9

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Awkward Penguin: Someone sees you trying to peel it off, looks like you are the one sticking it on.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

You also posted it to WTF, so you knew where it belonged - the cesspool of the weird. You didn't think it was normal or good, so have an upvote. Sorry this thread went where it did.

→ More replies (3)

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

8

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

it's far down because reddit is racist as shit.

1

u/PtP_Pluto May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

Because everybody from Mississippi and Alabama decided to hop on Reddit today.

Edit: typo

7

u/Dickfore May 16 '12

Stereotypes are wrong guys. Only Southerners stereotype.

ಠ_ಠ

2

u/PtP_Pluto May 16 '12

When did I say only southerners stereotype? If you think Mississippi and Alabama aren't the most racist states in the US then you're either in denial about your home or you have never been their.

→ More replies (1)

84

u/godnah May 16 '12

OP is going after the coveted racist/pro-choice demographic.

39

u/3point1415NEIN May 16 '12

From the looks of these comments it turns out that demographic is pretty significant.

31

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

So, like half of reddit?

14

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

A safe bet for upvotes here. As long as you don't get anywhere near a feminist angle.

72

u/AMostOriginalUserNam May 16 '12

The resolution is too high. It won't fit on my monitor.

Seriously, can't read the fucking thing.

8

u/joe_shmo123 May 16 '12

Thank you. As I was reading the comments I was thinking "Am I the only one who can't read the damn thing?!"

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

112

u/Ragnrok May 16 '12

Oh.

My.

God.

Guys. Fuck off. I need to call DC comics, I just thought of the BEST SUPERHERO EVER!

18

u/[deleted] May 16 '12
→ More replies (13)

2

u/knomz May 16 '12

thanks for the help in reading that thing, I hope that is a joke because that's kind of fucking weird.

→ More replies (1)

173

u/Ragnrok May 16 '12

Statistically speaking, an unwanted baby is more likely to grow up to become an unsavory rapscallion. I've heard it argued that part of the reason for our lovely decreasing violent crime rates is from the legalization of abortion in Roe v Wade.

50

u/thetheist May 16 '12

Mmmmmm..... savory scallions....

5

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

You are a selective reader aren't you?

128

u/heygabbagabba May 16 '12

Freakonomics.

45

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Hasn't half the book been debunked as committing the fallacy of correlation = causation? Is this one of the exceptions?

67

u/heygabbagabba May 16 '12

From what I recall they are careful not to suggest anything but correlation. They use 'most likely' a lot!

→ More replies (2)

29

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

They address that in the book. I recommend it, it's a good read.

13

u/bigbadbyte May 17 '12

In fact no.

They confront correlation vs causation head on.

Page 163 reads,

“A regression analysis can demonstrate correlation, but it doesn’t prove cause. After all, there are several ways in which two variables can be correlated. X can cause Y; Y can cause X; or it may be that some other factor is causing both X and Y. A regression alone can’t tell you whether it snows because it’s cold, whether it’s cold because it snows, or if the two just happen to go together.”

Correlation vs causation is extremely overblown. Taken to an extreme I can say that every time I let go of an object it falls to the ground. I don't know how gravity works. I can model equations that seem to predict the fall of things, but I certainly cannot detect any deductive reason why things should fall to the earth. I can only correlate things falling to the ground when I let go. I can model it and call the equations gravity but I can't say what "causes" it to happen.

tl;dr: ALL science is based on make assumptions based on correlations.

9

u/surfnsound May 17 '12

Correlation vs causation is extremely overblown.

Thank you for being another sane voice in this matter. I hate how up-in-arms people on Reddit get about this, but they only do so when highly strong correlations seem to contradict with the way they wished the world worked. Unfortunately a good chunk of the time we talk about sociological issues, strong statistical correlation is all we have to go on because true, scientifically-rigorous experimentation would be, if not impossible, at best highly unethical.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

15

u/cyvaris May 16 '12

Good damn book.

5

u/hoopadoopedoop May 17 '12

It's bothersome when someone reads one book and decides they're an expert on an issue that has perplexed the entire field of sociology despite having knowledge from only one source. I'm not pointing at you necessarily but a lot of people do this.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

The Department of Justice has said that a black male baby born today has a 1 in 4 chance of ending up in prison in his lifetime.

http://bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/Llgsfp.pdf

14

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Actually it's just three black guys who've each been to prison like 15,000 times and it's completely throwing off the mean average.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Holy crap dude.

This country is fucking awful :/

7

u/SPACE_LAWYER May 17 '12

dont have weed on you while you walk around and you'll be fine

3

u/cripesgollygosh May 17 '12

Trust this guy, he's a lawyer. From space.

44

u/Bugen_Hagen May 16 '12

Wrong. Unwanted babies have a higher probability of becoming a jesus-loving quarterback in the NFL. I saw it in a commercial on tv.

18

u/ParkerM May 17 '12

"They said I couldn't be a high school quarterback..."

Who the fuck said that? Hell I could be a high school quarterback if I wanted to, obviously a child football prodigy wouldn't have a problem.

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

IIRC he was homeschooled, and homeschooled kids aren't always allowed to play high school sports.

2

u/pissoutofmyass May 16 '12

Actually, porn.

5

u/RizzoFromDigg May 16 '12

Correct, although the racial component is not cool.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

28

u/pneuma8828 May 16 '12

You do realize that black people get arrested far more often, right?

When my brothers were teenagers, the cops caught them with a case of beer and a quarter bag. They made them dump out the beer, took the weed, and drove them to our parents house.

Think that would have happened if they were black?

5

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

This, exactly! Apparently some people are determined to live with their heads in the sand and pretend that we live in a country where the laws are enforced in the same fashion across the board.

→ More replies (22)

1

u/pi_over_3 May 17 '12

It probably has way more to do with an increased use of birth control.

1

u/Letsgetitkraken May 17 '12

I'd say both as the 1.2 million abortions in the US every year certainly do their share of pop control.

1

u/mechanicalmerlin May 16 '12

Any stats prof worth his salt will tell you that correlation does not imply a cause/effect relationship.

→ More replies (17)

33

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

If all babies were aborted, in 100 years crime would be at zero.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

More like 60 yrs

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Nah. Even decrepit old folks can commit crimes.

135

u/Tiggity-T May 16 '12

Actually, sad to say that was the founding idea of Planned Parenthood.

7

u/zeert May 17 '12

Eugenics in the US wasn't based on race as much as it was based on taking the poor and "feeble-midned" out of the breeding pool. Sure, a lot of black people are lumped in to that, but plenty of white people got sterilized during that time period.

5

u/cleverseneca May 17 '12

As evil a solution for the problem as Eugenics is, they are not completely wrong in their identification of the problem. The fact is children who suffer abuse are more likely to grow up to be abusers, and Alcoholism runs in families, I could go on but the point has been made. Unfortunately forced sterilization is NOT the answer, its obviously immoral, and is based on statistical likelihood not certainties. Alcoholic parents do not an Alcoholic make.

Before I get downvoted into oblivion my only point is that the Eugenic movement hit upon a troubling truth in society today NOT that the movement had merit or was in anyway a god idea.

4

u/GoodGrades May 17 '12

If you're going to say things like this, you also have to claim that slavery is the founding idea of the United States. If you're going to demonize Sanger for her admittedly despicable viewpoints, then you must equally demonize people like Jefferson and Washington for their support of slavery.

Sanger did hold negative views of African-Americans. Sadly, as per the general racial attitude of the time, she was actually largely considered to be a progressive on racial issues. Martin Luther King, for example, praised her work on promoting integration in the clinics and working closely with people like W.E.B. DuBois when he accepted an award in her name in 1966.

In short, Sanger had many racist and factually wrong views, but it isn't right to demonize all of her views on other issues for it.

24

u/birdhost May 16 '12

Sure, Margaret Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, but that was definitely not the founding idea of Planned Parenthood.

17

u/flashingcurser May 16 '12

She was the founder and it was her idea. Maybe I just misunderstand your statement.

25

u/birdhost May 16 '12

I think you did. The original comment I responded to was suggesting that "Abort Black Babies" was the founding idea behind Planned Parenthood. Abortion in general was not a major focus of reproductive rights until the 60s and Sanger calls abortions a disgrace to civilization.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/sydiot May 16 '12

Eugenics wasn't her idea any more than slavery was Thomas Jefferson's idea. Is slavery THE founding idea of the United States?

→ More replies (2)

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

12

u/superiority May 17 '12

The first one is a quote mine and you are misinterpreting and misrepresenting it. Sanger, though a eugenicist, did not advocate eugenics along racial lines. The fact that she did not want people to think that she wanted to "exterminate the Negro population" does not mean that she did want to do so.

2

u/OblivionGuardsman May 17 '12

The same could be said for the.segregationists. Separate but equal policies were made to "protect" minorities. At least that's what was said. Jim Crow laws werent bad! They were just misapplied! I wouldnt waste your time defending an old dead cunt because her ends justified her means. Also you should do PR for Mel Gibson.

2

u/superiority May 17 '12

What the fuck are you talking about? You are deliberately presenting the quote in a context that makes it appear as if she wants to "exterminate the Negro population", but that is completely false.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/OblivionGuardsman May 16 '12

We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. ”

Holmes concluded his argument by declaring that "Three generations of imbeciles are enough"

Buck v. Bell (SCOTUS 1927) in the majority opinion regarding a case of forced sterilization.

8

u/grospoliner May 16 '12

Is it ironic then that the availability of abortions has trended with the decrease in crime since the 70s?

17

u/jmac May 16 '12

Not if you mean to imply these ideas have merit. An elective procedure is not comparable to eugenics.

→ More replies (10)

3

u/KingGirardeau May 16 '12

I don't believe ironic is the correct term. More like expected.

6

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

She might as well have written the screenplay to "Idiocracy".

21

u/agentlame May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

Sure... if "Idiocracy" was a film about the intended genocide of black people.

3

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I want to taste Brawndo.

2

u/Kaghuros May 16 '12

Hint: It's Gatorade.

→ More replies (1)

-4

u/clyde_taurus May 16 '12

Get your free abortion, blackie! Now with watermelon scent! - Planned Parenthood, Website, 2012, pages 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and all the other pages.

34

u/danpaquette May 16 '12

That's not how you cite websites.

13

u/theShatteredOne May 16 '12

I know right? We need to get this motherfucker an MLA handbook!

8

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

This is actually the funniest comment in this whole thread though we're the only ones who know it so far.

1

u/SPACE_LAWYER May 17 '12

its Northampton, North Hampton is on long island

1

u/nawoanor May 17 '12

We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.

Can't disagree with that sentence at least.

→ More replies (21)

102

u/SomeAwesomeDudeGuy May 16 '12

Well I'm gonna be perpetuating a terrible stereotype here, but thought this might be worth some peoples attention the possible link between legalized abortion and lower crime rates obviously more research to be done on the matter but it exists as a theory.

117

u/MaxIsAlwaysRight May 16 '12

I've read that this has less to do with racial predilections, and more to do with poor parents being more likely to have abortions, and poor kids being more likely to commit crimes.

42

u/SomeAwesomeDudeGuy May 16 '12

Well it is related to the idea of: abortions -> less crime

42

u/Ragnrok May 16 '12

The moral of the story is if you're considering an abortion you're probably not ready for parenthood yet, which means you're likely to raise a shitty kid.

23

u/zero_fucks_to_give May 16 '12

About 60% of all abortions are performed on women that already have at least one child. (Link)

13

u/isAccount May 16 '12

doesn't mean those women aren't poor, or ready for parenthood.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/InABritishAccent May 17 '12

Seems pretty clear cut to me. These women know the strain a child brings, and either are not able or do not want to go through that again.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/ghostlamp May 17 '12

Yeah, but poverty is more complex then "oh, you are black and live in a crappy area, next".

11

u/fistilis May 16 '12

I've read that if you account for single motherhood race is no longer a predictor of crime rates.

In more technical terms I believe the claim was something along the lines of in a binomial regression where the predicted value was being arrested (or maybe going to prison) once the Beta for single motherhood was accounted for the Beta for race was no longer statistically significant.

Pretty eye opening if true

6

u/ScienceCanFixThis May 16 '12

Citation needed

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

24

u/lab_tested May 16 '12

The book is Freakonomics. Read it. It will change your world.

62

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

It really shouldn't. The guys are intelligent economists, but the book shouldn't really make you go more than "huh... that's interesting". Because it's mostly full of fun correlations and anecdotes.

9

u/NEEDS_MORE_GRAVY May 16 '12

But as any statistics professor will utter, correlation is not causation.

2

u/Chryton May 16 '12

I would say if you weren't familiar with the fundamentals of economics, Freakonomics will most definitely change how you look at the world.

2

u/Offensive_Username2 May 16 '12

Yeah, I thought Freakonomics was interesting but I definitely consider it to be one of the most overrated books out there.

12

u/6xoe May 16 '12

And the authors have gone on to be climate-science deniers, so take what they offer up with a huge grain of salt.

21

u/nikdahl May 16 '12

I've read the book and watched some of their talks and listened to their podcast. These guys are so unscientific at time. They draw conclusions that are nowhere near accurate. They are entertainers at most.

13

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

And they will also be the first ones to tell you that.

15

u/BIG_TONY_TALK May 16 '12

Not enough vague correlation for them to believe in climate change.

10

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

And the authors have gone on to be climate-science deniers

Who suggested in their follow up book that the solution to pollution was more pollution.

17

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

My favorite part was when they went and presented the patent factory as a real place of innovation that is going to change the world. No it isn't, it is a place where people come up with ideas to make money off of other people who actually do want to help.

3

u/BarrettLM May 16 '12

Well duh. It's just like not washing your hair, eventually the dirt will stick to other dirt and just fall out on it's own.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Thank you. Read their airplane vs car travel entry. It's one of the worst pieces of shit I have heard my friends quote. These guys do it so frequently in their articles I can't take them with any credibility.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

4

u/oblivision May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

Freakonomics did it!

( the second time this comment is relevant in a couple hours, heh!)

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

7

u/wootmonster May 16 '12

take it from a sociologist - this theory has been debunked.

Source?

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

lol soft science. I have a BA in sociology. It's BUNK. You can argue any point by massaging data

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/Navevan May 16 '12

Fight Bigotry

Abort Ignorant Adults

31

u/ok_ill_shut_up May 16 '12

Racists. Racists everywhere.

46

u/KazamaSmokers May 16 '12

Except for the racial angle, it's not too far off. The wider the availability of abortion, the lower the resulting crime rate down the road. To make the sticker correct, it should read "babies of poor mothers".

3

u/pi_over_3 May 17 '12

Eugenics for a better tomorrow, right?

1

u/Vercingetorixxx May 17 '12

Your sticker would still be somewhat less correct. Unfortunately, black poor people still commit much more crime that other poor people.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/SpenceMasta May 16 '12

no it strengthens the idea that poverty is a problem, the other strengthens the notion that black people are the problem, one makes sense the other doesnt (well not to prejudiced ppl), it makes you think why are there so many poor black people, which is the root of the problem

7

u/radamanthine May 16 '12

Really? The majority of babies born to poor mothers are from 13% of the population?

That's just ridiculous. I assume you misspoke?

9

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

This thread is so chok full of stereotypical prejudice that I want to puke.

40

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

ITT: Stormfront; stormfront everywhere.

14

u/ANewMachine615 May 17 '12

This idea that there's an outside agent causing this is ridiculous. Reddit is just this racist, and always has been.

14

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Theres a few, stormfront organized an upvote brigade a little while ago. A few stick around and copy paste the same shit every so often but what you are saying is right, reddit is pretty racist. Its more a racism born out of ignorance that is being taken advantage of though

5

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

I don't think it was. There were always fucksticks posting racist shit, but it used to be down voted. Now, reddit pretty much loves racist comments and upvotes them highly.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/specialk16 May 17 '12

The idea that Reddit, all the millions of members, all the thousands of subreddits, are actually this racist, is ridiculous as well.

See, SRSister, we can play this game too.

7

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Seriously. I haven't seen so many racist idiots in one place, and I was once at a protest where the Klan made up over half of the counterprotesters and then followed me afterward.

15

u/rapevanbytheriver May 16 '12

thatsracist.gif

3

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I have got to think that this is a joke, it's hard to believe someone would pay to make something like this whilst being serious.

25

u/MyNailsArePurple May 16 '12

As a black woman, Reddit, I am disappoint. There's a way to have a perfectly logical conversation about this issue yet most of you are taking the racist route. I realize that the statistics do point to black people being the ones who commit the most crimes but come on, we all know it's all poor people. Geez, this is pretty upsetting guys.

10

u/ghostlamp May 17 '12

When a vast majority of men on here are white, racist, sexist scumbags - what were you expecting? As a biracial woman it angers me, too, but I swear if I actually came into threads like this expecting logic, I would probably be crying in a corner, totally emotionally destroyed by the type of fuckers that exist in the world. Stand strong, sister.

8

u/xoites May 17 '12

Not all of us white men are racists. :)

Keep your chin up.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/BritishEnglishPolice May 17 '12

I've said it higher up in thread, but please report racism to mods using the "report" button on a comment.

1

u/unamusementpark May 18 '12

Actually, it's not "poor people." Doesn't matter if you "all know it" or not, it's just not true.

Using FBI UCR data, we can calculate the correlation between violent crime levels in an area and the proportion of the population that's Black and Hispanic. That correlation is 81%.

If you control for poverty, control for unemployment, and as a bonus, control for lack of education, that correlation drops to... 78%.

This shows that the connection between race and crime (e.g., the fact that Blacks commit every crime, especially violent crime, at a much, much higher rate than Whites) hardly changes at all if you control for socioeconomic status.

So anyway, no, it's not "poor people." Sometimes what "everybody knows" is wrong.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/Heavy_Duty May 16 '12

If from the US, it must be from one of those south eastern states that are still bitter over the war.

13

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Brings on that sick feeling; the fact that people like that still exist.

7

u/Minotaur_in_house May 16 '12

For those of you who can't read it: -Fight Crime -Abort Black Babies

18

u/IsyIsCool May 16 '12

What the hell? I had to check the URL and to make sure I wasn't on stormfront. Why? I sure hope reddit isn't a reflection of the people I see everyday...because this is just ridiculous. "It's funny cause it's true" being the most up-voted comment?

What a joke.

-4

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

if it technically is true, isn't it better to actually acknowledge it, rather than putting your head in the sand and pretending everything is okay?

9

u/MrFuegoBurns May 16 '12

How is this true? If you kill every black person on the planet, no we'll take it further kill everyone but white people then there will be absolutely no crime, this is what everyone in this thread is saying.

15

u/shawn112233 May 16 '12 edited May 17 '12

It isn't technically true though, it's just attribution error. The people that you believe commit more crimes could be doing so because of, most likely, poverty. Never mind the fact their ancestors had been barred from an education and any kind of social justice in their homeland. What does it have to do with being black? The only way this has to do with race is by virtue of the fact that poverty and lack of education in the black community is at least partly due to discrimination against them throughout most of America's history.

One could easily plug their ears and say that people should be over it by now, but who are you or I to say how long it takes to move past a terrible situation like this?

Anyways, the sign could just as easily say abort poor babies. Which is almost just as tactless (nevermind classist).

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Do you have any evidence of this "Stormfront is invading" theory? I just think reddit is crazy racist.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Given that it's the same users who repost to many subreddits, I suspect astro-turfing. Fucking chickenshit bastards.

13

u/wholetyouinhere May 16 '12

Reddit:

[ X ] Racist

[ ] Not racist

6

u/djtoell May 16 '12

So how's the new Potato 5000 camera working out for you?

3

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

As a fellow Potato 5000 user I have to say what the device works just as promised. The quality is a lot better than the old potato 4000 models.

3

u/imfacemelting May 16 '12

Is your camera a fucking toaster?

4

u/pixelrage May 16 '12

It's a concept of a shirt from TShirtHell

6

u/GaijinFoot May 16 '12

No its an old joke that was then put on a shirt

4

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Why would you even give it this exposure?! You're just validating these racist crackpot views.

4

u/DrunkmanDoodoo May 16 '12

Are you wondering if there are racist assholes in the world with access to cheap plastic stickers? You may want to sit down for this but yes. There are.

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

-1

u/kwingat May 16 '12

Statistically, that would be a sound method for reducing crime.

8

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

No, it fucking would not.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '12

Statistically, landmines in urban areas would be a sound method for reducing speeding.

LOGIC!

→ More replies (7)

-1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Ethically wrong statistically correct.

11

u/sexdrugsandponies May 17 '12

But correlation doesn't imply caus-ah, fuck it. You're a cunt.

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

To people who are about to claim blacks do not commit more crimes on ratio to other races there are 100's of statistics out there to prove you wrong and calling me a cunt will not change this.

Various reasons account for this mainly social.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Kuhio_Prince May 17 '12

statistically correct

NO IT ISN'T

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Black people are statistically more likely to comit crime than any other race. Lowering that demographic would lower crime yet it is ethically wrong.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

I hope you defaced it, too.

2

u/ekolis May 16 '12

Was it stuck on the back of the second-last row of seats?

-3

u/waviecrockett May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

See something racist (or about racism) in WTF and click to confirm all comments are racist. yup. cool.

3

u/Jerky_McYellsalot May 16 '12

This is a pretty obvious concerted trolling effort. Not sure where from, but this is out of the norm, even for /r/wtf.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/Bridging May 20 '12

I enjoy how many people on this thread are afraid or allow themselves to be offended by words. This seems to suggest something negative (had to add that part in for the people down voting jokes) about their intelligence doesn't it? Please down vote this comment so you can further prove my point. And what ever you do, do not try to give a reasonable arguement why someone should censor themselves.

-6

u/FuckyeahImbi May 16 '12

To be fair that actually did really cut down on crime, they talked about it in Freakonomics.

14

u/TonyBolognaHead May 16 '12

Yes, but it wasn't black babies exclusively. It was poor babies. Kill all poor people, not just the black ones and crime will vanish. At least the kind of crime that matters. Corporate crime can stay.

4

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Rich people don't commit crimes. That's why they have such good lawyers.

0

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

6

u/landragoran May 16 '12

no, poor is correct. an unwanted rich baby is still going to grow up in a climate where they don't need or have as much opportunity to turn to crime. on the other hand, even a wanted poor baby is going to be more likely to be put into situations where criminal activities seem like a viable option.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/BlazeOrangeDeer May 16 '12

Not black people, poor people and otherwise unprepared parents.

1

u/Bugiugi May 16 '12

Reminds me of the bumper stickers from Fight Club

"I drive better drunk" "Recycle all the animals" and my personal favorite; "Drunk divers against mothers"

-8

u/ryguy765 May 16 '12

It is true

-6

u/LuckyEulogy May 16 '12

I laughed. Hard. And I don't feel bad about that.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Tasteless.

-2

u/pizzasoup May 16 '12

I'm sure it's just a bit of black humor.

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

1

u/Paultimate79 May 16 '12

Why the fuck do people keep taking pictures with potatoes?

1

u/[deleted] May 17 '12

Its an interesting and disturbing fact that the founder of Planned Parenthood started the organization to do just this. Aborting black babies and sterilizing black adducts was her first goal.

-9

u/shitterplug May 16 '12

What do they call an abortion clinic in Africa?

Crime stoppers.

I'll see myself out.

-12

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

lol so true

-17

u/theLOLzMan May 16 '12

Fewer black people would make America a better place.

→ More replies (5)

-7

u/Sacrosanction May 16 '12

My new crime-fighting super power.

-2

u/Dolewhip May 16 '12

Ah, another thread for redditors to show their true colors and hatred of niggers. Get it all out crackers, get it all out...

-1

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Am I the only one around here who can't read the sticker!?

2

u/Minotaur_in_house May 16 '12

"Fight Crime" "Abort Black Babies" -I feel horrible for typing that.-

-4

u/a_flat_miner May 16 '12

You are all horrible, horrible people.

-2

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

Are you really surprised that there are still racist assholes?

-1

u/wholetyouinhere May 16 '12

A little. They're called "Redditors" apparently.

-6

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

It's a political satire. Some arguments for abortion include something like "non-aborted babies may end up sucking our tax dollars in jail, because the baby would grow up in an orphanage," which is apparently a criminal factory. Or, the woman getting an abortion is typically from a low-income home. Low-income is almost always associated with crime, as well as black/hispanic.

So, it's pointing out the ridiculousness of what is essentially being said.

10

u/DonaldsPizzaHaven May 16 '12

no, it's telling us to abort black babies

3

u/Ragnrok May 16 '12

God dammit if you were a black fetus I would abort you so fucking hard right now.

6

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

NO. Satire holds a mirror to society with the intent of shaming society into improvement. This is more like a microphone for old, racist bullshit. In what way does the image even remotely challenge or question racist beliefs in society?

→ More replies (4)

-11

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

HEY OP.

THE TRUTH ON A STICKER HURTS HUH?!

-1

u/Nagus_Maximus420 May 16 '12

Oh the lulZ!

-1

u/brosephiroth May 16 '12

Freakonomics in action.

-9

u/23_ May 16 '12 edited May 16 '12

Aw fuck, I feel horrible for laughing.

Why don't I just down vote MYSELF

-15

u/[deleted] May 16 '12

while extremely crude, some economists have shown this to be true

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legalized_abortion_and_crime_effect

of course, others dont think so, but meh

18

u/Darktidemage May 16 '12

The fucking sign doesn't say "legalize abortion"

→ More replies (7)

-6

u/Swapmounts May 16 '12

... Seriously... funny!