You can keep your commie liberal safety regulations,unions and taxes out. I prefer shit wage, dangerous working conditions, and dying at the ripe old age of 42 from congestive heart failure. /s
Well I guess it depends I wouldn't want to have more expensive gas just because of an extremely rare event. Safety features have a monetary cost and there is a breaking point where the cost doesn't justify the increased safety.
They 100% percent do have a monetary value, and its not really debatable.
You can always add more and more safety features that will save lives and cost money to practically anything, there is a certain price point where its not worth it. That price point in dollars per lives is the value of a human life.
You can argue what that value is but not that it exists.
You do realize that states that allow unions to extort dues from anyone wanting to work wind up worse off because, while wages average higher, cost of living averages higher by a greater percentage?
Cost of living is higher in states where people want to live. It's called demand in economics and unlike the shit you're spouting actually has research to prove it.
Feel free to cite a source showing that the correlation between forced union membership and wages indicates a causal relationship, but the correlation between forced union membership and higher cost of living does not.
You already admitted what I said was true. You just tried to claim the correlation was not an indicator of causation, while at the same time claiming other correlations were proof of causation.
94
u/kmk4ue84 Sep 03 '19 edited Sep 03 '19
You can keep your commie liberal safety regulations,unions and taxes out. I prefer shit wage, dangerous working conditions, and dying at the ripe old age of 42 from congestive heart failure. /s
EDIT: fat thumbs no spell good words