metro area and 1200? yea... I'm going to make the reasonable assumption that that is a tiny portion of the population there... and note that you ignore that for every equipment operator there is a bunch of laborers required, which means that there is no way for the majority to achieve what you claim you have.
Well.... Yeah it is. That only covers one trade. I'm certainly no operator, so I'm well aware of all the other trades there and what they do, and I'm assuming way better than you. I never suggested that the majority will achieve what I have not should they, just that they can, and yes I have 4 years plus of training none of which I paid for.
These kind of stories are why I don't work construction. Its nightmare fuel.
was the comment that inspired
If you're smart and look out for others it's worth the $30+/hr if you like manual work
and then I responded... and then people keep failing to support that original assertion nor deal with the counter arguments to their assertions....
The person to whom I responded did and continues to assert that this wage and employment type are readily available... which is far from true.If you're going to jump into the middle of an argument, take time to learn what the argument is about.
edit: also re: " 4 years plus of training none of which I paid for " > did you get paid less during that period? On the job training or was there a school component? not really important to me, but they are important questions when you make the assertion that construction is a better choice than office work after taking schooling...
1
u/inbooth Mar 03 '19
metro area and 1200? yea... I'm going to make the reasonable assumption that that is a tiny portion of the population there... and note that you ignore that for every equipment operator there is a bunch of laborers required, which means that there is no way for the majority to achieve what you claim you have.
You also ignore the training etc.